Sodomy II: Anwar’s defence questions existence of lubricant

  • Nation Premium
  • Tuesday, 28 Oct 2014

PUTRAJAYA: The defence in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's appeal has questioned whether there was penetration in the alleged sodomy case, as Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony was inconsistent with regards to the existence of a commonly-used sexual lubricant.

Lawyer Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram, a former Federal Court judge, argued that according to the evidence from the complainant Mohd Saiful at the High Court, the act was vigorous and fast and he suffered pain in his anus and stomach. 

Article type: metered
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights

Next In Nation

INTERACTIVE: How is Malaysia's Covid-19 booster rollout faring? Premium
Johor polls: MCMC, telcos to facilitate high-speed Internet requirements, says Annuar Premium
JPJ denies officers involved in 'flying licence' syndicate Premium
Former Sarawak governor Tun Salahuddin passes away Premium
Making it easier for public to vote Premium
Almost half of adults given booster dose Premium
‘Key to avoiding a huge spike is control, management’ Premium
How to hold elections during a pandemic Premium
Electricity tariff relief continues Premium
Bill to limit PM’s term to be tabled in Parliament Premium

Others Also Read