Sodomy II: Anwar’s defence questions existence of lubricant


PUTRAJAYA: The defence in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's appeal has questioned whether there was penetration in the alleged sodomy case, as Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony was inconsistent with regards to the existence of a commonly-used sexual lubricant.

Lawyer Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram, a former Federal Court judge, argued that according to the evidence from the complainant Mohd Saiful at the High Court, the act was vigorous and fast and he suffered pain in his anus and stomach. 

The Star Festive Promo: Get 35% OFF Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

'No more being soft on betrayal': Kota Melaka Bersatu chief urges tough action
Bersatu disciplinary board hauls up Hamzah, four others on Feb 12, says notice
Sabah to look into claims of Semporna accommodations being owned by foreigners, says Jafry
There are laws, no need to be vigilantes, says Fahmi
Fire breaks out at factory in Seapark
Health Ministry to focus more on prevention as costs for treating NCDs balloon
Knife-wielding man chases uni student at Melaka mall
RM100 Sara aid starts tomorrow: This time we will be ready, says Fahmi
OPTR offers 20% discount as Sabah electricity tariffs rise
Thai van driver pleads not guilty to dangerous driving, causing motorcyclist's death

Others Also Read