China's top court posts guidelines on deepfakes, AI disputes


Recent years have seen widespread adoption of AI technologies that allow individual users to easily create content that convincingly replicates the appearance and voices of real humans. — Pexels

BEIJING: China's top court issued guidelines on Sept 7 covering a range of emerging pitfalls associated with artificial intelligence (AI), including unauthorised deepfakes and voice cloning, state media reported.

The move provides judicial guidance for AI-related disputes in China, which is currently engaged in an intense competition with the United States for dominance in the key technology.

The guidelines released by the Supreme People's Court "make clear that people cannot use AI to create or distribute recognisable digital replicas of others without their consent, including cloned faces and voices", state news agency Xinhua reported.

Other disputes targeted include "algorithmic price discrimination and AI-generated false information", Xinhua said.

Recent years have seen widespread adoption of AI technologies that allow individual users to easily create content that convincingly replicates the appearance and voices of real humans.

Chinese authorities have invested heavily in domestic AI, seeking to build up the country's prowess in the increasingly crucial sector.

But President Xi Jinping has also warned of potential dangers, urging attendees at a conference in July to "strengthen risk-awareness and ensure that AI is secure and controllable".

Under the new rules, service providers can be found legally liable if they fail to "take timely action" once notified that their systems have generated content infringing on others' rights, Xinhua reported.

The guidelines offer legal recourse for "someone whose face has been digitally altered and used to spread false and defamatory sexual claims", it added.

The court's Vice President Tao Kaiyuan said that the guidelines seek to "balance development and security", according to a transcript of a press conference on Sept 7 published on the court's website.

They seek to clarify rules for procedural matters in AI-related disputes, said Tao.

"For issues where consensus is currently difficult to reach, (the guidelines) leave room for clarification, allowing for further experience accumulation and appropriate clarification when conditions are ripe," she added. – AFP

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Tech News

Want a good night’s sleep? Stop worrying about sleepmaxxing – and ditch the fitness trackers
Europe’s biggest mobile operators in talks for satellite-to-mobile venture, Bloomberg News reports
OpenAI has sent EU incident report on hijacked German website, Commission says
Tech companies look to Argentina’s windswept Patagonia to build massive data centers
US Feds open probe into Musk's steering-wheel-free taxis a day after he began offering rides in them
Why Meta disabled the cameras on thousands of its smart glasses
Huawei launches new foldable smartphone as competition with Xiaomi, Apple heats up
Huawei, Xiaomi to debut new top phones on eve of foldable iPhone
Scientists warn about a creepy new AI side effect on humans
Can dogs sniff cancer? AI joins the hunt in India

Others Also Read