UK Supreme Court ruling on patents and AI is boost for innovation, lawyers say


A general view outside the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in London, Britain September 24, 2019. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls

LONDON, Feb 11 (Reuters) - An artificial ⁠neural network, a type of artificial intelligence which can engage in machine ⁠learning, can be patented, the United Kingdom's Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday ‌in a decision welcomed by lawyers as a boost for patenting AI innovations.

Emotional Perception AI applied for a patent for an artificial neural network (ANN) which can recommend media files, such as music, and which ​it says is able to produce another file with ⁠can evoke a similar emotional response ⁠in the user, even irrespective of genre or personal taste.

The UK Intellectual Property Office ⁠refused ‌the application in 2022, prompting a flurry of appeals before the Supreme Court ruled in Emotional Perception AI's favour on Wednesday.

The Supreme Court ruled ⁠that a computer program can be patented if it involves ​the use of physical ‌hardware - which lawyers said was a significant change to the law - and ⁠that, as an ​artificial neural network can only be used on hardware it could in principle be patented.

The court sent the case back to the Intellectual Property Office, to decide whether to grant a ⁠patent.

Following the court's decision, the Intellectual Property Office ​said the ruling had clarified the law.

Patent lawyers said the judgment would have significant implications for applications for all software patents, not just relating to AI, in the UK.

Jonathan ⁠Ball, a partner with the law firm Norton Rose Fulbright described the ruling as "a major boost for AI innovators", adding that it "could make it easier for AI companies to secure patent protection in the UK".

Alex Morgan, from Paul Hastings, said the decision was "consistent ​with the UK positioning itself as an AI-friendly, pro-innovation ⁠jurisdiction and could boost its attractiveness for companies developing advanced machine learning technologies".

Lara Sibley, ​a partner at Marks & Clerks, agreed the ruling may ‌be helpful to applicants for AI-related patents, but ​cautioned that it remained to be seen how the Intellectual Property Office will interpret and apply it.

(Reporting by Sam Tobin, Editing by William Maclean)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Tech News

Banks launch sale of EA buyout's $5.75 billion cross-border loan
Encyclopedia Britannica sues OpenAI over AI training
Apple unveils second-generation AirPods Max at $549, more than five years after debut
Exclusive-OpenAI courts private equity to join enterprise AI venture, sources say
Meta shares jump after Reuters report on plans for layoffs of 20% or more
Crypto company Abra to go public in blank-check merger
Alibaba CEO takes helm of new AI-focused business group
Nebius signs AI infrastructure deals with Meta worth up to $27 billion over 5 years
European publishers, tech firms urge EU to speed up fine on Google over search
Russia fines Telegram app $432,366 for failing to remove banned content, Ifax reports

Others Also Read