New York Times reporter sues Google, xAI, OpenAI over chatbot training


FILE PHOTO: A Google logo is seen at a company research facility in Mountain View, California, U.S., May 13, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo

Dec 22 (Reuters) - An investigative ‌reporter best known for exposing fraud at Silicon Valley blood-testing startup Theranos suedElon ‌Musk's xAI,Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta Platforms and Perplexity on Monday for using copyrighted ‌books without permission to train their artificial intelligence systems.

New York Times reporter and "Bad Blood" author John Carreyroufiled the lawsuit in California federal court with fiveother writers, accusing the AI companies of pirating their books and feeding them ‍into the large language models (LLMs) that power the companies' chatbots.

The ‍lawsuit is one of several copyright ‌cases brought by authors and other copyright owners against tech companies over the use of ‍their ​work in AI training. The case is the first to name xAI as a defendant.

A spokesperson for Perplexity said that the company "doesn't index books." Spokespeople for the ⁠other defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment ‌on the lawsuit.

Unlike other pending cases, the writers are not seeking to band together in a larger class action - ⁠a type of ‍lawsuit they said favors defendants by allowing them to negotiate a single settlement with many plaintiffs.

"LLM companies should not be able to so easily extinguish thousands upon thousands of high-value claims at bargain-basement ‍rates," the complaint said.

Anthropic reached the first major settlement ‌in an AI-training copyright dispute in August, agreeing to pay $1.5 billion to a class of authors who said the company pirated millions of books. The new lawsuit said class members in that case will receive "a tiny fraction (just 2%) of the Copyright Act’s statutory ceiling of $150,000" per infringed work.

Monday's complaint was filed by attorneys at law firm Freedman Normand Friedland includingKyle Roche, whom Carreyrou profiled in a 2023 New York Times article.

During a November hearing in the Anthropic class ‌action, U.S. District Judge William Alsup criticized a separate law firm Roche co-founded for gathering authors to opt out of the settlement in search of "a sweeter deal." Roche declined to comment on Monday.

Carreyrou told the judge ​at a later hearing that stealing books to build its AI was Anthropic's "original sin" and that the settlement did not go far enough.

(Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington; Editing by David Bario and Alistair Bell)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Tech News

Netflix searches for franchises after losing out on Harry Potter
Humanoid robots offer Europe path to stay in tech race
Amazon eyes $9 billion Globalstar deal to rival SpaceX's Starlink, FT reports
Ahead of Greek social media ban, parents desperate to separate children from phones
It’s International Fact-Checking Day. Refresh your AI identification skills
Meta, YouTube verdict escalates calls for teen social media limits
AI machine sorts clothes faster than humans to boost textile recycling in China
Anthropic rushes to limit leak of Claude Code source code
Seeking a sounding board? Beware the eager-to-please chatbot.
Crisis contractor for OpenAI, Anthropic eyes a move to combat extremism

Others Also Read