(Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Friday narrowed an injunction that blocked California from enforcing a law meant to protect children when they use the internet, while agreeing that part of the law would likely be found unconstitutional.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said NetChoice, a trade group was likely to show that the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act violated the First Amendment by requiring businesses to opine on and reduce the risk that children may face harmful materials online.
But the court set aside the rest of the preliminary injunction, saying the judge who imposed it failed to properly assess NetChoice's other objections, or whether the law could survive without the unconstitutional parts.
NetChoice's members include Amazon.com, Alphabet's Google and Facebook parent Meta Platforms.
The law, the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act required platforms, before releasing any online products and services, to assess whether their offerings could harm children. (This story has been corrected to remove TikTok as a member of NetChoice in paragraph 4)
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Rod Nickel)
