THE HAGUE: When Covid riots rocked the Netherlands for the second time in a year, Ricardo Pronk was there to livestream it all to his followers on social media.
The 50-year-old anti-vaccination activist administered a Facebook group with 10,000 followers, which had shared a call for a demonstration in the port city of Rotterdam on Nov 19 that later turned violent.
The group, which was recently removed by Facebook, is part of a network of conspiracy theorists and Covid-deniers on social media reaching as far as the Dutch parliament, whose influence has sparked concern among experts.
For Pronk, vaccines “are weapons made to kill”. He also embraces the QAnon conspiracy group’s narrative about “satanic child abuse” by a “globalised elite”.
But the unemployed former computer technician, who had chosen a banner for the group with a lion against a backdrop of flames, rejects any responsibility for the unrest in the Netherlands.
Five people were shot when police opened fire in Rotterdam, and riots spread around the country for the next three days.
“Violence is not the best way, of course not. The best is to do things peacefully,” he told AFP.
Surge in disinformation
Both in January, during the Netherlands’ worst riots in 40 years over a curfew, and last week’s unrest, social media were used not only to organise protests, but also to spread disinformation.
“What is unique about the Netherlands is that we have repeatedly seen Covid protests turn into riots just this year,” said Ciaran O’Connor, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue in London, which specialises in countering radicalism.
While Prime Minister Mark Rutte has branded rioters “scum” and “idiots”, O’Connor pointed the finger at the epidemic of conspiracy theories on the Internet in the Netherlands.
On Facebook alone, the top 125 groups disseminating false information about Covid-19 saw a 63-percent rise in followers in six months, comprising 789,000 members in this country of 17 million people, an ISD study said.
Telegram groups during last week’s riots were filled with plans for demonstrations, calls for riots, along with messages targeting Muslims, Jews and gay people.
The social media groups “usually don’t call for violence but they may accept it as part of the solution”, said O’Connor.
“The anti-vax and anti-Covid movement is creating a space allowing for other forces to engage and express their frustration in a violent way.”
Dutch authorities blamed the riots on a variety of culprits, ranging from frustrated youths to football hooligans and genuine coronavirus protesters – but they also underlined the importance of social media in organising them.
In June, Dutch intelligence services said they feared that anti-government demonstrations “are a breeding ground for extremism”.
In a country where 85% of adults are vaccinated, the anti-vax movement “is a clear minority group”, said Claes de Vreese, professor of political communication at the University of Amsterdam.
But unlike in neighbouring countries, “their voice has been strongly amplified by the fact that they have found a political ally in parliament”, namely the Forum for Democracy party.
The leader of this far-right group, Thierry Baudet, has largely dropped his anti-immigration rhetoric to adopt a strong anti-vaccination stance and to promote conspiracy theories.
Baudet has been dubbed the Dutch Donald Trump and one of his tweets was labelled misleading by Twitter ahead of elections in March, a first for a Dutch politician.
One of the party’s lawmakers was reprimanded recently for threatening a fellow MP in parliament with a “tribunal” if the Forum came to power, because of his support for the government’s policies.
O’Connor at ISD said that some material was slipping under the radar of the social media giants because it was in Dutch.
“Compared to the US or the UK, Twitter or Facebook don’t have the same focus on gatekeeping their platforms against people who use them irresponsibly,” he said. – AFP