Facebook must face claims linked to sex trafficking, judge says


Facebook hasn’t put effective safeguards in place to block sex traffickers because it benefits from advertising to more than two billion users, according to the lawsuits. — AFP

Facebook Inc must face lawsuits filed by three US women claiming they were forced into prostitution as teenagers by abusers who used the social-media site to ensnare girls.

Justice James Blacklock of the Texas Supreme Court said in a ruling Friday the women can sue Facebook under a state law that allows legal action against those who benefit from sex trafficking. But he said they can’t pursue claims under federal law that Facebook failed to warn minors and take measures to block sex trafficking activity on its site.

Facebook hasn’t put effective safeguards in place to block sex traffickers because it benefits from advertising to more than two billion users, according to the lawsuits. The women claim the company won’t use advertising space for public service announcements regarding the dangers of sex trafficking.

Facebook appealed to the Supreme Court after it failed to get the complaints thrown out in district court and the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Texas. The company argued that it is protected under Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act, which shields websites from lawsuits over what users post online.

The judge rejected that argument. “The statutory claim for knowingly or intentionally benefiting from participation in a human-trafficking venture is not barred by Section 230,” the judge ruled.

Facebook didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Blacklock sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings and suggested that the Section 230 provisions written in 1996 may be outdated and ripe for Congress to overhaul.

“Perhaps advances in technology now allow online platforms to more easily police their users’ posts,” Blacklock said. “On the other hand, perhaps subjecting online platforms to greater liability for their users’ injurious activity would reduce freedom of speech on the Internet by encouraging platforms to censor ‘dangerous’ content to avoid lawsuits.”

In March, a federal court in Houston ruled that Salesforce.com must face state and federal over sex-trafficking facilitation complaints by several young women who said their pimps repeatedly sold them for sex through Backpage.com classified ads. – Bloomberg

Article type: free
User access status:
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!
   

Next In Tech News

As they enter a 4th generation, are foldable phones finally mature?
This free tool lets you extract text from images
Google Stadia is dead, but its controllers live on
Twitter says users will be able to appeal account suspension
New smart-home standard for Android and Google devices has arrived
In NBA version of 'Pok�mon Go' you seek basketball pros, not monsters
U.S. SEC probes Elon Musk's role in Tesla self-driving claims - Bloomberg News
Twitter research group stall complicates compliance with new EU law
Top French university bans use of ChatGPT to prevent plagiarism
Man in SG admits to sexually exploiting minors, including two sisters he met on boy band fans’ chat group

Others Also Read