At Epic v Apple's closing, judge probes implications of upending Apple's App Store


Lawyers from Apple and Epic speak with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers during a weeks-long antitrust trial at federal court in Oakland, California, U.S. May 24, 2021 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Vicki Behringer

(Reuters) - Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers held unconventional closing arguments Monday in the antitrust trial between Epic Games and Apple Inc, peppering both sides' attorneys for three hours about how far she could - and should - go to change Apple's App Store business.

App makers and regulators around the world are watching the trial and Gonzalez Rogers has hinted in sharp questions to Apple that she may be receptive to some of the "Fortnite" game creators' allegations that Apple misuses its control over the App Store and hurts developers.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Tech News

New York Times sues Perplexity AI for 'illegal' copying of content
Senator Elizabeth Warren calls Netflix-Warner Bros deal an antitrust 'nightmare'
Analysis-Europe forges ahead with Big Tech crackdown with X fine, defying Trump
Apple, Google send new round of cyber threat notifications to users around world
Cloudflare restores services after minor dashboard outage
Netflix to buy Warner Bros Discovery's studios, streaming unit for $72 billion
X hit with $140 million EU fine for breaching content rules, TikTok settles
AI bubble to be short-lived, rebound stronger, NTT DATA chief says
SoftBank's Arm plans to set up chip training facility in South Korea
Shein hits back at French government in court hearing over sex dolls, weapons

Others Also Read