At Epic v Apple's closing, judge probes implications of upending Apple's App Store


Lawyers from Apple and Epic speak with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers during a weeks-long antitrust trial at federal court in Oakland, California, U.S. May 24, 2021 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Vicki Behringer

(Reuters) - Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers held unconventional closing arguments Monday in the antitrust trial between Epic Games and Apple Inc, peppering both sides' attorneys for three hours about how far she could - and should - go to change Apple's App Store business.

App makers and regulators around the world are watching the trial and Gonzalez Rogers has hinted in sharp questions to Apple that she may be receptive to some of the "Fortnite" game creators' allegations that Apple misuses its control over the App Store and hurts developers.

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

   

Next In Tech News

Instagram rolls out teen account with privacy, parental controls as scrutiny mounts
Big Tech, calls for looser rules await new EU antitrust chief
Germany's Scholz says Intel committed to German site despite delay
EssilorLuxottica extends smart glasses partnership with Meta
Drivers more likely to be distracted while using partial automation tech, study shows
Trump offers little detail at crypto business unveiling
'Active now': How to hide your activity status on Instagram
Apple's new AirPods Pro double as a 'clinical-grade' hearing aid
Meta bans RT and other Russian state media networks
Germany's coalition argues over Intel subsidies in new budget dispute

Others Also Read