At Epic v Apple's closing, judge probes implications of upending Apple's App Store


Lawyers from Apple and Epic speak with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers during a weeks-long antitrust trial at federal court in Oakland, California, U.S. May 24, 2021 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Vicki Behringer

(Reuters) - Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers held unconventional closing arguments Monday in the antitrust trial between Epic Games and Apple Inc, peppering both sides' attorneys for three hours about how far she could - and should - go to change Apple's App Store business.

App makers and regulators around the world are watching the trial and Gonzalez Rogers has hinted in sharp questions to Apple that she may be receptive to some of the "Fortnite" game creators' allegations that Apple misuses its control over the App Store and hurts developers.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Tech News

Meta, YouTube verdict escalates calls for teen social media limits
AI machine sorts clothes faster than humans to boost textile recycling in China
Anthropic rushes to limit leak of Claude Code source code
Seeking a sounding board? Beware the eager-to-please chatbot.
Crisis contractor for OpenAI, Anthropic eyes a move to combat extremism
Meet the new AI coworker who won’t stop snitching to your boss
EU, US to tackle digital frictions through talks
Perplexity AI machine accused of sharing data with Meta, Google
The AI video apps gaining ground after OpenAI declared�Sora dead
Advocacy groups urge YouTube to protect kids from 'AI slop' videos

Others Also Read