At Epic v Apple's closing, judge probes implications of upending Apple's App Store


Lawyers from Apple and Epic speak with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers during a weeks-long antitrust trial at federal court in Oakland, California, U.S. May 24, 2021 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Vicki Behringer

(Reuters) - Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers held unconventional closing arguments Monday in the antitrust trial between Epic Games and Apple Inc, peppering both sides' attorneys for three hours about how far she could - and should - go to change Apple's App Store business.

App makers and regulators around the world are watching the trial and Gonzalez Rogers has hinted in sharp questions to Apple that she may be receptive to some of the "Fortnite" game creators' allegations that Apple misuses its control over the App Store and hurts developers.

Get 30% off with our ads free Premium Plan

Monthly Plan

RM9.73/month

Annual Plan

RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

   

Next In Tech News

Man uses hidden cameras disguised as clocks to record dogsitter, other women, US cops say
A large US health care tech company was hacked. It's leading to billing delays and security concerns
Apple’s iPhone steeply discounted in China on weak demand
‘Pig-butchering’ scams net more than RM355bil, study finds
Google faces wider antitrust probe over online ads in Canada
Nintendo sues company for piracy on ‘colossal scale’
Meta says it will no longer pay for news in Australia, Germany and France
Opinion: Don't use rice for your device. Here's how to dry out your smartphone
Hewlett Packard Enterprise sees downbeat Q2 revenue on weak networking solutions demand
EU consumers challenge Meta paid service as privacy 'smokescreen'

Others Also Read