Soccer-Southampton CEO calls playoff final expulsion "manifestly disproportionate"


FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Championship - Play Offs - Semi Final - Second Leg - Southampton v Middlesbrough - St Mary's Stadium, Southampton, Britain - May 12, 2026 Southampton fans outside the stadium before the match. Action Images/Peter Cziborra/File Photo

May 20 (Reuters) - Southampton's expulsion from the ⁠Championship playoff final and a four-point deduction for next season is a "sanction which bears ⁠no proportion to the offence", the second-tier club's CEO Phil Parsons said on ‌Wednesday.

Southampton were thrown out of Saturday’s Championship playoff final – the richest game in world soccer – after being found guilty of spying on semi-final opponents Middlesbrough in one of the harshest punishments imposed in the English game.

Middlesbrough have now been ​reinstated and are due to face Hull City at Wembley ⁠on Saturday.However, Southampton have appealed against the ⁠decision by the Independent Disciplinary Commission, with a final ruling expected later on Wednesday.

"On the appeal ⁠itself: ‌we accept that there should be a sanction. What we cannot accept is a sanction which bears no proportion to the offence," Parsons said in a statement.

"Whereas Leeds United ⁠was fined 200,000 pounds ($267,940) for a similar offence, Southampton has ​been denied the opportunity to ‌compete in a game worth more than 200 million pounds and one which means ⁠so much to ​our staff, players and supporters.

"We believe the financial consequence of yesterday's ruling makes it, by a very considerable distance, the largest penalty ever imposed on an English football club."

Even a single season in the Premier League, ⁠followed by immediate relegation, is estimated to be worth ​around 200 million pounds over three seasons through broadcast revenue, sponsorship and parachute payments.

In 2019, Leeds were fined 200,000 pounds and reprimanded for spying on Derby County. Then-Leeds boss Marcelo Bielsa admitted his staff ⁠had watched all the club's opponents in training that season.

Parsons listed examples of other sanctions such as Luton Town's 30-point deduction in 2008-09 for a club in League Two but with "no comparable revenue at stake" as well as Derby's 21-point deduction in 2021 that cost them their Championship ​status.

"We say this not to minimise what occurred at this club, ⁠which we have accepted was wrong. We say it because proportionality is itself a principle of natural ​justice," Parsons added.

"The Commission was entitled to impose a ‌sanction. It was not, we will argue, entitled to ​impose one that is manifestly disproportionate to every previous sanction in the history of the English game."

($1 = 0.7464 pounds)

(Reporting by Rohith Nair in Bengaluru; Editing by Ken Ferris)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Football

Soccer-Spain's Lopez confirms he will miss World Cup after surgery on fractured foot
Soccer-Switzerland opt for consistency in World Cup selection
Soccer-Southampton set to pay heaviest price for sporting espionage
Chelsea to face JDT in club friendly on Aug 11
Soccer-Celebrations erupt in North London after Arsenal seal Premier League title
Soccer-UEFA hands lifetime ban to Czech coach who secretly filmed female players
FAM names Qatari officials for Malaysia Cup final
Soccer-Australia defender Matthews exits pre-World Cup camp with injury
Soccer-Tottenham's relegation decider bigger than a trophy, says De Zerbi
New York City hotels reach labour deal before World Cup

Others Also Read