Consistency in Sulu rulings


THE rulings of the Hague Court of Appeal in the Netherlands and the Paris Court of Appeal, which dismissed the Sulu claimants’ application for recognition and enforcement of a purported arbitral award of US$14.9bil (RM69.6bil), have been hailed as landmarks.

But let’s not forget that the rulings of both courts are consistent with those of the Malaysian judge who heard the Malaysian government’s application in 2019 for a number of declarations, including that there was no arbitration agreement in the 1878 agreement. (See Government of Malaysia V Nurhima Kiram Fornan & Ors [2020] MLJU 425)

Get 30% off with our ads free Premium Plan

Monthly Plan

RM9.73/month

Annual Plan

RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

letters , opinion ,

   

Next In Letters

Reduce leakages, cut wasteful spending before increasing SST for electricity
Unfriendly side of new systems
Please appoint SPA chairman
Long wait to clear KLIA immigration
Pensioners miss out on RM100 emadani credit
Prey augmentation efforts crucial to saving Malayan tigers from extinction
'Taib was a good friend and colleague'
Release dynamism of Bumiputra business with small banks
Insurance companies must act more speedily on claims
Time to scrap controlled sugar pricing

Others Also Read