Study shows most Muslims want Syariah law

  • Letters
  • Wednesday, 17 Dec 2014

WE agree with the 25 top Malay figures that a solution must be found to “the continuing unresolved disputes on the position and application of Islamic laws in this country” in “Need for a consultative process” (The Star, Dec 8).

The disputes are rooted in the tension created by the marginalisation of Islamic law and administration in the Federal Constitution as state matters with very limited jurisdiction which goes against the wishes of Muslims, who constitute the majority here, to live under Syariah law.

The 2013 worldwide survey by the Pew Research Center found that “overwhelming percentages of Muslims in many countries want Islamic law (Syariah) to be the official law of the land” but applicable only to their country’s Muslim population.

In Malaysia 86% and Indonesia 72%, of Muslims participating in the survey favoured making Syariah the official law.

The top 25 Malay figures confirm the Pew survey finding when they write: “As Muslims, we want Islamic law, even more than civil law, to meet the highest standards of justice precisely because it claims to reflect divine justice.”

Muslims believe it is incumbent upon them to live according to the teachings of the Syariah; to enjoin the good and forbid evil and to promote justice.

For over a thousand years, before the coming of Western colonialism, Syariah played a central role in the lives of Muslims and in the state administration.

The colonisation of Muslim societies by the Western powers led to the ossification of the Syariah judicial system. Its jurisdiction was confined largely to legal issues connected with family and marital matters. It had no role in public law, commerce, trade, industrial relations and other important areas of human activity.

Hence, it was disabled by the colonial administration to grow and develop in order to meet the challenges of modernity.

On the impact of colonialism on the development of Islamic law in the Malay States, a British educationist R.J. Wilkinson wrote: “There can be no doubt the Muslim Law would have ended by becoming the law of Malaya had not British law stepped in to check it.”

No country can ignore the wishes of such large majorities without adverse consequences to stability and peace.

We need to find ways to accommodate the Muslim need for Syariah within a democratic constitutional framework without impinging on the rights of minorities.

Therefore, the Government should set up a high-powered committee to review our Federal Constitution and to recommend amendments to incorporate the needs of the Muslims and entrench the rights of minorities.

A constitution is not cast in stone as to be unchangeable. It is a living document and has to grow with the changing needs of our people.

The committee should consist of Muslim and non-Muslim experts on Constitutional law, Islamic law and other relevant fields.

It should, in addition to reviewing the Federal Constitution, address the weaknesses in the current truncated Syariah judicial system and make recommendations to overcome them.

The criticisms aimed at Islamic law and administration by the 25 top Malay figures are not helpful in promoting discussion and debate on the issues as they are too general for comment.

For example, they allege that Syariah Criminal Offences laws of Malaysia “are in conflict with Islamic legal principles and constitute a violation of fundamental liberties...”

They have not provided any evidence to support their bare allegation. The charge is serious for it reflects on the competence

of the state governments, state legal advisors and the Attorney-General.

How can they approve laws that are contrary to Islamic legal principles?

We are heartened by the initiative of retired senior civil servants, judge, diplomats and feminists to publicly address the alleged injustice and weakness in Islamic law and administration.

We hope they will show similar concern on other issues such as the growing disparity between the rich and poor, the destruction of our environment, erosion of moral and ethical values, corruption, abuse of power and issues of governance.

It will also be beneficial to the nation for them to share their knowledge, experience, expertise and time with civil society organisations to promote social-justice, environmental protection and national unity.

1. Mohd Azmi Abdul Hamid, president, Malaysian Consultative Council of Islamic Organisation (Mapim);

2. Sohibus Samahah Tan Sri Dr Hj Harussani Hj Zakaria , Mufti of Perak;

3. Sohibus Samahah Datuk Dr Wan Salim Mohd Nor , Mufti of Penang;

4. Datuk Wan Mohamad Datuk Syeikh Aziz , former Director-General, Jakim;

5. Datuk Syeikh Mohd Nor Mansur Al Hafiz , former Director of Islamic Department of Perak;

6. Datuk Dr Hj Awang Sariyan, Director-General, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP);

7. Prof Datuk Dr Ir Wan Ramli Wan Daud, Professor of Chemical Engineering, UKM;

8. Prof Dr Tengku Mohd Tengku Sembok, Computer Science, former Deputy Vice-Chancellor University. Pertahanan Malaysia

9. Prof Ismail Mohd, Profesor Mathematics, UniMaP;

10. Prof Emer Dr Shaharir Mohammad Zain, Professor of Mathematics, former Dep. Vice-Chancellor UKM;

11. Datuk Hj Sulaiman Abdullah, former law lecturer,

Universiti Malaya;

12. Datin Dr Mehrun Siraj, former Law Professor, Former Commissioner of Suhakam;

13. Prof Dr Wan Mokhtar Wan Yusof , Professor of Microbiology, UKM;

14. Prof Dr Khairuddin Omar, Professor of Computer Science, UKM;

15. Prof Dr Mohamed Aslam Mohamed Haneef, Professor of Economics, UIAM;

16. Prof. Dr. Mohd Sahaid Khalil, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, UKM

17. Prof Dr Husna Azhari, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, UKM;

18. Prof Dr Mohd Nazari Ismail, Dean, Faculty of Business and Accounting, Universiti Malaya;

19. Prof Dr Mohamed Aslam Mohamed Haneef, Economist, UIAM;

20. Prof Madya Dr Ahmad Shahbari @ Sobri Salamon , chairman of Syariah Advisory Board, Bank Islam;

21. Prof Madya Dr Aidil Abd Hamid, Microbiochemistry, UKM;

22. Prof Madya Dr Zaini Hamzah, Nuclear Scientist, UiTM;

23. Prof Madya Dr Mat Rofa Ismail, Professor in Etnomatematik, UPM;

24. Dr Mohammad Alinor Abdul Kadir, Mathematician, Felo Inspem;

25. Dr Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor, secretary Ulama Association of Malaysia, Deputy Director

(Research & Development), Academy of Islamic Studies, Universiti Malaya;

26. Dr Halim Muhammady , Vice-Chair of WADAH , Chairman of Bairuni Research Consultant, Former Head Of Quranic Studies Department, Faculty of Islamic Studies, UKM;

27. Hj Ahmad Awang, former Director of Islamic Centre, Malaysia

28. Hj Abdul Ghani Samsudin, chairman of Secretariate for the Assembly of Ulama Asia, former Head Department of Basic Social Studies, Universiti Malaya;

29. Dinsman (Shamsuddin Osman), president Paksi;

30. Datin Aminah Zakaria, Chair of Persatuan Persaudaraan Muslimah Malaysia, former principal of Kolej Islam, Klang;

31. Ir Hj Asari Daud, former Deputy Director of DID; and

32. Ir. Kassim Muhammad, Former Director DID , Perlis

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Next In Letters

A salute to our great teachers
Intelligence is not only academic
Where is my parcel, Mr Postman?
Win-win solution in transfer controversy
Let’s observe Earth Day with silence
Turn empty spaces into urban farms to grow food
Pondering the strategy of mixing and matching vaccines
Focus on vaccination for elderly vital
Use PA system to remind bazaar visitors to stay safe
Saving the planet is a global effort

Stories You'll Enjoy