Japan’s Strategic Choice in a Turbulent World: Lessons from Malaysia’s Pragmatic Neutrality and Strategic Autonomy


The Convergence and Conflict of Three Global Orders

IN the contemporary era, the conceptual landscape of global governance is defined by a fierce competition between distinct ideological frameworks. Currently, two primary paradigms claim to offer a path for the collective future of humanity. The first is the "Sustainable Development Goals" (SDGs), a framework spearheaded by the United Nations and largely driven by Western liberal democracies. The second is the "Community with a Shared Future for Mankind," a vision uniquely proposed by China. While both share the common goals of "sustainability" and "multilateralism", they also differ in their geopolitical implications and philosophical foundations.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Columnists

Trump chickens out again
PAS is keen to engage with the Chinese community, but are we ready for it?
The sullied American connection
Right club, right manager – why fit still defines success
Global green economy booming, but developing countries left behind
The impact of ageing on male fertility
Doubts about Penang's future CM
Harmony is the answer, not hate
Unity and the spirit of Raya
Bullying escalates online

Others Also Read