Judge rejects US Justice Dept bid to block votes from alleged noncitizens in California


FILE PHOTO: An election sign encouraging people to vote is displayed in the front yard of a residential home in Encinitas, California, US, October 21, 2026. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo

Oct 28 (Reuters) - A US judge ⁠strongly rebuked the Trump administration on Wednesday by rejecting a request by the Justice Department to temporarily block California from counting mail ballots for the midterm elections from more ⁠than 20,000 registered voters the department alleges arelikely noncitizens.

The decision marks the latest setback for President Donald Trump's effort to boost the federal government's role in elections ‌ahead of the November 3 midterms, with his Republican Party locked in a tight battle to retain control of both houses of Congress.

US District Judge David Carter issued the decision after a hearing on Tuesday in Los Angeles federal court over the Justice Department's request for a temporary restraining order barring officials from counting any ballots from the individuals it flagged.

"Never before in American history has the federal government, on the eve of an election, sought to coerce a state and ​local government to abandon their own Constitutional elections procedures and bend to the will of the Executive Branch," Carter wrote ⁠on Wednesday.

The judge, an appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton, said the Justice ⁠Department's last-minute request to exclude over 20,000 ballots ran afoul of "longstanding constitutional principles mandating that states have control over their elections."

Carter warned that a ruling in the Trump administration's favor could ⁠create ‌chaos and cause thousands of registered voters to "potentially lose the right that generations of Americans have fought to preserve."

"Eroded trust in our democracy is irreparable," Carter wrote. "Once a vote is segregated, lasting harm has occurred. If the Executive can discount votes and threaten an ongoing election due to unproven allegations, then our democracy is in danger."

The Justice Department swiftly appealed the decision to the ⁠9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. The department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Justice Department ​filed the lawsuit on October 15, a rare intervention in ‌the voting process weeks before an election.

California has said the state's safeguards againstnoncitizen voting are robust. It said the Justice Department's assertions relied on "suspect data" and that complying with ⁠its demands would risk disenfranchising eligible ​voters.

California is the most populous US state and a Democratic stronghold. It has more seats in the House of Representatives — 52 — than any other state.

Trump has made California a focal point of his sweeping immigration crackdown since returning to the White House, accusing it of undermining public safety through its "sanctuary state" policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Trump has repeatedly insisted that states are not doing enough to stop voting by noncitizens, which he ⁠says is widespread despite multiple studies and state audits showing it is rare.

APPEALS COURT REJECTED EMERGENCY REQUEST

Carter ruled ​two days after a federal appeals court on Mondayrejected an unusual emergency request by the Justice Department asking the appeals court to temporarily block California from counting the ballots before Carter had the chance to rule.

The Justice Department did not indicate how many of the more than 20,000 people it flagged in California had actually submitted a mail ballot.

It had argued that a restraining order was necessary to ensure that ⁠California did not impede prosecutors' ability to enforce a federal law that makes it illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal elections.

But Carter said the Justice Department never explained why counting ballots would impair any prosecutions under the law, as states are not required to help the federal government investigate and prosecute crimes.

Apart from California,the Trump administration has sought to intervene in elections in two states that are home to competitive races.

In Alaska, the Justice Department last week asked a judge to prevent certification of election results if the Republican incumbent senator loses by a slim margin, alleging that the presence ​of another candidate with a similar name on the ballot could confuse voters. Alaska has urged that the case be dismissed, arguing it has ⁠taken steps to distinguish the two candidates on the ballot.

In Washington state, the Justice Department on Mondaysent a letter asking officials not to count any ballots received from 400 voters it said may not ​be citizens.Washington's top elections official said the timing of the request indicated it was intended to cast unfounded suspicion on election ‌results.

California had 23 million registered voters as of December 2025, while Washington had 5 million registered ​voters as of 2024, state records show.

Voting rights activists have expressed concern that the federal government's methods for scrutinizing state voter lists to identifynoncitizen voters risk wrongly flagging naturalized citizens for removal from the rolls.

(Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York, Nate Raymond in Boston and Andrew Goudsward in Washington; Editing by Nia Williams, Chizu Nomiyama and Stephen Coates)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In World

Airline groups urge US CDC to reconsider Ebola declaration requirements
Microsoft's quarterly revenue rises 19 pct, net income up 32 pct
Sichuan flavors bring Chinese culinary heritage to Oxford
U.S. stocks close higher as Fed holds rates steady
Flavio Bolsonaro declares himself "leader of Brazil" despite election defeat
Canada not in position yet to sign U.S. trade deal: Carney
Proposed Air Canada-United deal likely to harm market competition: regulator
Explainer: Two deadly crashes in nine months: What's happening to Spain's high-speed rail?
U.S. stocks close higher
Flavio Bolsonaro declares himself rightful president-elect of Brazil

Air Pollutant Index

Note: API is calculated based on 24hr running average of the most dominant parameter.

Highest API Readings

    Select State and Location to view the latest API reading

    Others Also Read