Guyana tells World Court Venezuela's claim on oil-rich Esequibo region poses existential threat


FILE PHOTO: A member of the National Assembly of the Assembly holds a map showing the disputed Esequibo region as part of Venezuela, as tensions between the Venezuela and Guyana have ratcheted up in recent weeks over a long-running territorial dispute, in Caracas, Venezuela, December 6, 2023. REUTERS/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria/File Photo

THE HAGUE, May 3 (Reuters) - Guyana ⁠has asked judges at the International Court of Justice to rule ⁠that Venezuela does not have a legitimate claim on the potentially ‌oil-rich region around the Esequibo river, which has been the subject of a dispute between the Latin American neighbours since colonial days.

"Facing a larger and more powerful neighbour's designs on ​our territory has not only threatened our peace ⁠and security, it has held back ⁠our development," Guyana's Foreign Minister Hugh Hilton Todd told judgesat the start of ⁠week-long ‌hearings at the ICJ, also known as the World Court.

At issue is a 160,000-square-km (62,000-square-mile) border territory around the Esequibo river, which is ⁠mostly jungle, and an offshore area where massive discoveries ​of oil and ‌gas have been made.

Todd said Venezuela's "unlawful" claim applies to more than 70% ⁠of Guyana's ​territory.

In 2018, Guyana brought the case to the ICJ - the United Nations' top court - which deals with disputes between states, and asked it to confirm the border laid ⁠down in an 1899 arbitration between Venezuela and ​the then-colony of British Guiana, according to which the territory belongs to Guyana.

In a 2023 referendum Venezuelan voters rejected the ICJ's jurisdiction over the territorial dispute ⁠with Guyana and backed the creation of a new state in the Esequibo region which Venezuela established a year later.

After the capture of President Nicolas Maduro and his wife by U.S. forces in January, Venezuela is being run ​by an interim government. Venezuela will have a chance ⁠to set out its case on Wednesday.

A final judgment in the case is ​months away. Rulings of the ICJ are binding ‌and without appeal, but the court has ​no way to enforce them itself, instead relying on the U.N. Security Council.

(Reporting by Stephanie van den Berg; Editing by Hugh Lawson)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Others Also Read