U.S. judge orders $1.68 billion payout to families over 1983 Beirut bombing


  • World
  • Thursday, 23 Mar 2023

The witness stand (rear L) and the judge's chair (rear C), face towards the defense table (L) and prosecution table (R), in Part 31, Room 1333 of the New York State Supreme Court, Criminal Term at 100 Centre Street, in New York, February 3, 2012. REUTERS/Chip East (UNITED STATES - Tags: CRIME LAW)

(Reuters) - A federal judge in New York ordered Iran's central bank and a European intermediary on Wednesday to pay out $1.68 billion to family members of troops killed in the 1983 car bombing of the U.S. Marine Corps barracks in Lebanon.

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska said a 2019 federal law stripped Bank Markazi, the Iran central bank, of sovereign immunity from the lawsuit, which sought to enforce a judgment against Iran for providing material support to the attackers.

Attorneys for the parties did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Oct. 23, 1983, bombing at the Marine Corps barracks killed 241 U.S. service members.

Victims and their families won a $2.65 billion judgment against Iran in federal court in 2007 over the attack.

Six years later, they sought to seize bond proceeds allegedly owned by Bank Markazi and processed by Clearstream Banking SA, a Luxembourg-based unit of Deutsche Boerse AG, to partially satisfy the court judgment.

Bank Markazi has argued that the lawsuit was not allowed under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), which generally shields foreign governments from liability in U.S. courts.

In January 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling in the families' favor, and ordered the case to be reconsidered in light of the new law, which was adopted the month before as part of the National Defense Authorization Act.

Preska said the 2019 law authorizes U.S. courts to allow the seizure of assets held outside the country to satisfy judgments against Iran in terrorism cases, "notwithstanding" other laws such as FSIA that would grant immunity.

A Luxembourg court in 2021 ordered Clearstream not to move the funds until a court in that country recognizes the U.S. ruling. Clearstream has appealed that decision.

The case is Peterson et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-09195.

(Reporting by Jody Godoy in New York)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In World

Analysis-Trump election subversion case bogs down as allies' legal woes grow
Missile launched from Yemen's Houthi area, no injuries reported, CENTCOM says
Turkish court convicts Syrian woman over Istanbul bombing, media says
Analysis-Arrest of Russian defence minister's deputy may be strike by rival 'clan'
Former tabloid publisher to face more questions in Trump hush-money trial
Burkina Faso suspends BBC, VOA radio broadcasts over killings coverage
'Lucky to have him': Australia mourns refugee guard killed in Bondi attack
Trump ready to renew conservative alliance with Hungary's Orban
Kenya Airways accuses Congo of harassment over detained staff
Inside Big Tech’s underground race to buy AI training data

Others Also Read