CAMOUFLAGE print is everywhere in Malaysian fashion. Cargo pants, jackets, caps, backpacks, even phone cases. You can buy camo anything at any pasar malam in the country without anyone batting an eye.
But somewhere in the Minor Offences Act 1955, there is a provision that might make you look at your wardrobe a little differently.
Can wearing camouflage in Malaysia really get you fined and even jailed?
Verdict:
TRUE, BUT
Under Section 25A(1) of the Minor Offences Act 1955, any person who is not a member of the armed forces of Malaysia or a visiting force who wears any camouflage uniform or any part thereof, or anything resembling a camouflage uniform, is guilty of an offence. The penalty is a fine of up to RM500, imprisonment of up to six months, or both.
The key word in that sentence is "uniform."
The Act's Second Schedule defines a camouflage uniform specifically as a hat, a long-sleeve jacket and trousers made from camouflage cloth.
"Any part thereof" means any one of those three items worn individually.
"Anything resembling a camouflage uniform" extends the provision to garments that could reasonably be mistaken for military-issue clothing.
This is where the distinction matters.
A military-style long-sleeve camo jacket that looks like it came off a soldier's back is almost certainly caught by the Act.
A pair of camo-print fashion shorts from a streetwear brand that no one would mistake for military clothing is a much harder case to make.
The word "uniform" implies military-style garments, not every item of clothing that happens to use a camouflage pattern.
So if you own a trendy camo jacket from a fashion label, you are probably fine.
If you own something that genuinely looks like it belongs to the Armed Forces, the law has a view on that.
Where the Act gets genuinely broad is on possession of the material itself.
Section 25A(1) also covers anyone who has in their possession, custody or control any camouflage cloth.
The Second Schedule defines camouflage cloth as cotton drill or polyester viscose material of khaki base colour with intermittent brown, grey, dark green and black patches of unspecified shape and size.
That definition does not distinguish between cloth intended for military use and cloth sold by the metre at a fabric shop.
On a strict reading, possessing the fabric alone could technically be an offence regardless of whether it has been made into a uniform.
The manufacturing and selling side carries even heavier penalties. Under Section 25A(2), anyone who makes, manufactures, sells, buys, imports or exports camouflage cloth or any camouflage uniform without the written permission of the Minister faces a fine of up to RM1,000, imprisonment of up to 12 months, or both.
Police can arrest without a warrant and seize the clothing or cloth under Section 25A(3)(a).
The provision is not a relic from another era quietly gathering dust.
It is actively referenced by law enforcement.
In July 2026, Bukit Aman Criminal Investigation Department director Datuk Seri Mohd Noor Hisam Rosli warned the public that wearing military costumes or possessing items resembling military equipment could lead to legal action.
He confirmed that during the first six months of 2026, one investigation paper was opened under Section 140 of the Penal Code following a viral video showing a man wearing clothing resembling security personnel while carrying what appeared to be an imitation weapon, The Star reported.
"Ignorance of the law cannot be used as an excuse to avoid legal action," said Mohd Noor Hisam.
In January 2025, police investigated an NGO whose members were found wearing uniforms similar to those of security forces, leading to statements being recorded from multiple individuals and a request to the Home Ministry to deregister the organisation, The Star reported.
The reason the law exists goes beyond aesthetics.
Camouflage clothing that genuinely resembles military uniforms can be used to impersonate armed forces personnel, gain access to restricted areas, conduct fake checkpoints or commit crimes while appearing to be authority figures.
In a country where uniformed personnel are treated with deference and rarely questioned, the potential for misuse is real.
In practice, enforcement focuses on cases where camouflage is worn in a manner that could genuinely be mistaken for military dress or facilitate criminal activity.
Nobody is being arrested for wearing camo shorts to the mamak.
But the law does not draw a clean line between fashion camouflage and military camouflage in its definitions, which means the provision is broader on paper than it is in practice.
The safest reading is this: if what you are wearing could make someone think, even for a moment, that you are a member of the armed forces, Section 25A applies. If it could not, you are on safer ground, though the possession provision for camouflage cloth remains uncomfortably wide.
Sources:
