Appeals court dismisses appeal over King's refusal to declare emergency


PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal here Monday (May 4) dismissed a lawyer's appeal challenging the then Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah's refusal of the then prime minister's request to declare a state of emergency five years ago.

A three-man bench led by Federal Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah, sitting with Court of Appeal judges Supang Lian and Dr Alwi Abdul Wahab upheld the High Court's ruling that the King's decision cannot be reviewed by the court.

Justice Sequerah said Article 150(8) of the Federal Constitution states that such matters are non-justiciable and the court is barred from inquiring into them.

He said the provision requires the King to be satisfied that a grave emergency exists, and that such satisfaction "shall be final and conclusive and shall not be challenged or called in question in any court on any ground".

He added that it is for the executive to advise the King on whether the circumstances existed to justify the declaration of an emergency.

Justice Sequerah also said the court could not exercise its judicial power over matters of national security, adding that policy-related issues such as national security, foreign relations, public order and morality are beyond the institutional competence of the judiciary.

On Feb 15, 2024, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur dismissed Syed Iskandar Syed Jaafar Al Mahdzar's originating summons, which, among others, sought the court's determination on whether, under Articles 40 and 150 of the Federal Constitution, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has the authority to refuse to declare a state of emergency even if advised to do so by the prime minister or Cabinet.

The then High Court judge Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh (now Chief Justice) ruled that Article 150(8) does not violate the basic structure of the Federal Constitution and cannot be struck down under Article 40(1), which states that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall act on the advice of the Cabinet.

Syed Iskandar filed the suit in November 2020, naming the Malaysian government and 10 others as the defendants.

At the Court of Appeal proceedings Monday, Syed Iskandar was represented by lawyers T. Gunaseelan and R. Kengadharan, while Senior Federal Counsel Liew Horng Bin represented the Malaysian government. Lawyer Datuk Bastian Pius Vendargon appeared for the Malaysian Bar as amicus curiae (friend of the court). - Bernama

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

'Allah' inscription at shrine: Shop owner released on police bail, probe ongoing, says Kangar OCPD
Anwar conveys condolences on Jalil Hamid's passing
Domestic trade enforcers seize 59,000 litres of diesel in Pahang
Malaysia to press on with Gaza humanitarian mission, says Amirudin
Tour van driver in crash involving eight Indian nationals tests positive for meth
Health Ministry seeks re-evaluation of proposed budget cuts, says Dzulkefly
Rafizi leaves MACC HQ after over nine hours, to return tomorrow
Ten M'sian activists safe in Istanbul, to continue in second wave of GSF 2.0 mission
Man claims trial to sexually assaulting his two underage daughters
Penang heatstroke death: Hill run organisers complied with SOPs, says exco rep

Others Also Read