Putra Heights inferno: Registration Department issues 312 replacement documents


KUALA LUMPUR: The National Registration Department of Selangor has issued 312 replacement documents to victims of the gas pipeline fire in Putra Heights, Subang Jaya, Selangor.

Its director, Muhammad Hafiz Abdul Rahim, said the list included replacement identity cards, birth certificates, marriage certificates, and other documents that were destroyed in the incident.

"This assistance (for document replacement) is important because many victims need valid documents for matters such as banking, insurance claims, zakat (tithe) and registration for disaster aid," he said when met at the Putra Heights Mosque temporary relief centre on Saturday (April 5).

He said documents that require further processing, such as MyKid and marriage certificates, would be completed later before being handed over to the victims involved.

"Applications for replacement of birth certificates are processed and handed over directly, but there are also victims who have applied for replacement adoption certificates and marriage certificates… all these are provided for free," he said.

Muhammad Hafiz said the department collaborates with agencies like the Selangor Zakat Board (LZS) to ensure the victims receive the necessary assistance. – Bernama

 

 

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Documents , JPN , Matters , Assistance , Blaze , Relief Centre

Next In Nation

Fire breaks out at recyclable materials site in Shah Alam’s Seksyen 36
Preparations underway for RON95 ban on foreign-registered vehicles, says Armizan
Foul odour leads to discovery of three bodies in Merbok home
Police seize RM1mil ketamine at Pangkor beach
Cabinet feedback sought on energy security, work-from-home proposal
Cops seek help to locate missing teen girl in Ampang
Woman robbed in her sleep at Sandakan home
Retiree loses over RM328,000 to phone scam
MIC’s loyalty to BN ‘clear, firm, forward-looking’, says Zambry
Victor Chin: RM9.5mil was ‘service fee’, not bribe to enforcement agencies

Others Also Read