Judge erred in vernacular school case, says lawyer


PUTRAJAYA: The High Court judge who ruled that teaching Tamil and Mandarin in vernacular schools was constitutional had erred when he said that the usage of the languages at the schools was protected under Article 152(1) of the Federal Constitution, the Court of Appeal heard.

Lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla said the judge, Justice Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali (now a Court of Appeal judge), made an error in his reading and interpretation of policy papers on the education system and language to determine his interpretation of Article 152(1) of the Constitution.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
vernacular schools , appeal , courts , constitution , MCA

Next In Nation

Iran truce spurs hopes for world economy, but recovery will be rocky
Over 210 tonnes of e-waste seized in Port Klang
Cabinet to provide special assistance to Ling's family
Fuel prices April 9-15: Unsubsidised petrol up 40sen, diesel in peninsula up 70sen
Used car dealer fined RM7,500 for cheating customer
Singapore's refusal to negotiate with Iran regrettable, says Nurul Izzah
Dr Akmal's resignation rejected, still a Melaka exco member, says CM
Defamation suit against Najib not meant to destroy him politically, says Dzulkefly
Cloud seeding requests from five states with declining dam levels, says MetMalaysia
Malaysian Media Council enters Phase 2 of complaints mechanism

Others Also Read