Judges bound by precedents in deciding on constitutional issues, says Chief Justice


KUALA LUMPUR: The judiciary is merely defending its judicial functions by using precedents to decide on constitutional issues, says Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat.

She said there may be some who think that the judiciary was now more powerful than before following decisions on constitutional issues of late.

Tengku Maimun said in performing their judicial duties, judges in Malaysia are bound by existing legal principles.

"Regardless of whether a judge applies these principles or not does not mean that he or she is a 'liberal' or 'conservative'. In my view, there are only legally coherent or incoherent decisions - not liberal or conservative decisions,” she said.

Tengku Maimun said this in her speech at the Golden Jubilee celebration of University Malaya’s (UM) Faculty of Law here Friday (June 17).

Also present were Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob, former chief justices Tun Arifin Zakaria and Tun Md Raus Sharif and Energy and Natural Resources Minister Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan.

Citing several recent precedents, including the Semenyih Jaya and Indira Gandhi cases in 2017 and 2018 respectively, Tengku Maimun said both were decided unanimously by five judges, before she was appointed as a Federal Court judge.

"And then there is a third case, the Alma Nudo Atenza case in 2019 which was also decided unanimously by nine Federal Court judges where the principles of constitutional law decided in the Semenyih Jaya and Indira Gandhi cases were strengthened.

"The principles that have been decided through the three cases above, which are often referred to as the 'trilogy of cases' are in line with my understanding, which more or less was formed from the lessons I gained in this faculty," she said.

Tengku Maimun also said the legal principles were instilled in her during her four years of study at UM’s Law Faculty and throughout her career.

"They include the principle of judicial impartiality and as a judge, freedom to make decisions in accordance with the Federal Constitution and the rule of law without any internal or external pressure or influence.

"This is also in line with the oath of office and allegiance of a judge, which is to always preserve, protect and defend the Malaysian Constitution,” she said.

Separately, Tengku Maimun also recalled her faculty days, which began in 1978, before going on to receive her Bachelor of Laws in 1982.

Tengku Maimun said back then, she learned many things, not only from a legal point of view but also the values and principles of life.

"I would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation and gratitude to all the lecturers who had given me a lot of guidance and shaped my understanding of the laws today,” she said. - Bernama

Article type: free
User access status:
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!
   

Next In Nation

Stay united and prioritise the nation, says Nga
Appointment of Ahmad Zahid as DPM a betrayal of Pakatan voters, says Bersatu leader
Khairy congratulates newly-appointed successor, hopes she will uphold excellent public health system
I am honoured to be part of unity govt under Anwar, says Ewon on new ministerial appt
Cuepacs, MEF say Cabinet line-up possesses credibility, ability to work hard
Improve laws and women’s rights, says group
Sabah housewife loses over RM500,000 in love scam
Being appointed DPM a recognition for GPS, Borneo bloc, says Fadillah
Khaled helms Higher Education Ministry for a second time
Anwar hopes to restore economic confidence through new approaches in Finance Ministry

Others Also Read