Adam Rosly loses appeal to set aside conviction, six months' jail, fine

Datuk Adam Rosly Abdullah. -filepic

PUTRAJAYA (Bernama): The Court of Appeal has upheld the conviction, six months' jail term and RM30,000 fine on former Ampang Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK) chief, Datuk Adam Rosly Abdullah for giving false statements and submitting fake documents to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

A three-member bench comprising Datuk Yaacob Md Sam, Datuk P. Ravinthran and Datuk Wira Ahmad Nasfy Yasin dismissed Adam Rosly's appeal on Monday (March 1).

The court affirmed the Sessions Court’s decision on April 26,2018 which sentenced Adam Rosly to six months’ jail and fined him RM30,000 after finding him guilty of six counts of giving false statements and submitting fake documents to the MACC during an investigation in 2017 into claims of his extraordinary wealth.

Justice Yaacob, who delivered the court's unanimous decision, held that Adam Rosly's conviction was safe and supported by evidence.

He issued a warrant of committal against Adam Rosly, 33, for his jail sentence to take effect from Monday.

On the first two charges, Adam Rosly was accused of giving false recorded statements to two MACC investigating officers, under Section 32(8)(c) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLATFPUAA) 2001.

The false statements were related to his career as a businessman, his income, luxury vehicles, RM1.2mil bungalow in Kampung Melayu, Ampang which was bought in cash, RM200,000 loan from his mother-in-law and late grandmother, and RM500,000 loan from an "ah long”.

On the other four charges, he allegedly used two fake loan agreement documents from two individuals and two cash vouchers from his company, Gegas Mentari Holding Sdn Bhd, to mislead the MACC investigating officers, an offence under Section 89 of the same Act.

He allegedly committed the offences at the MACC headquarters at the Federal Government Administrative Centre, Putrajaya, between 9am and 12.15pm on Feb 10,2017 and between 9am and 2pm on Feb 22, the same year.

On Nov 26,2019, he lost his appeal in the High Court.

The court proceeding resumed on Monday to hear submissions by Deputy Public Prosecutor Wong Poi Yoke who submitted that the offences committed by Adam Rosly by giving false statements and false documents to the enforcement agency to avoid declaring his wealth that was under investigation were serious offences.

She said the offences committed by Adam Rosly were not trivial in nature which did not justify the bond of good behaviour or only a fine to be imposed on him.

On Dec 9, last year, the court heard submissions by Adam Rosly's counsel Muhammad Fadhli Mat Sutris that the prosecution failed to prove that the statements given by his client were false testimony.- Bernama

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 46
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Adam Rosly , AMK , MACC , false , Court of Appeal


Next In Nation

Nancy Shukri: Malaysia in midst of identifying travel bubbles with other nations
Jeffrey Kitingan: Sabah firm on resolving prolonged salary cuts for UCSF staff
Over 400 boxes of illegal alcohol seized by cops in Klang raid
Covid-19 spike: Kg Domis cluster in Kelantan contributes 162 cases
Covid-19: Two villages in Serian and Lundu under EMCO on April 23-May 6
Two schools in Johor and Kelantan under EMCO from April 23-May 6
Ismail Sabri: 200 detained for MCO violations on Wednesday (April 21)
Melaka mulling compounds for educational institutions which do not observe SOP
Covid-19: All Sibu govt departments told to close pantries to reduce workplace infections
PMO: Land lease for Convent Bukit Nanas extended by 60 years

Stories You'll Enjoy