Despite objections from the opposition, the amendment was passed on the second attempt after the original Bill was tabled and deferred on Tuesday, due to ambiguities over defining “resident in the state” in Article 16 according to Section 71 of the Immigration Act.
Tourism, Arts and Culture Minister Datuk Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah yesterday withdrew the first Bill in order to table a new Bill without reference to the Immigration Act.
He said the new Bill would remove interpretative ambiguities on the intent and purpose of the proposed amendment, which was to ensure that only Sarawakians could stand for election to the state legislature.
“The state government does not want people from outside Sarawak to meddle in our affairs and play any role in determining the destiny of our state.
“The state government’s Sarawak First policy is meant to ensure that Sarawak’s interests are safeguarded by Sarawakians and outsiders should not come in with their brand of politics that could destabilise our state,” he said when tabling the Bill.
Karim said the new amendment defined “resident in the state” as a citizen born in Sarawak, with at least one parent also born in the state, who is normally a resident in the state, or a citizen not born in Sarawak but has one parent born in the state and is normally a resident in the state.
Opposition lawmakers raised concerns on the new proposed definition of “resident in the state”, saying it was still ambiguous.
Baru Bian (PSB-Ba’Kelalan) said a child born in Sarawak to non-Sarawakian parents who were also born in Sarawak was not automatically a Sarawakian.
“We cannot define a person as a Sarawakian solely based on his or his parents’ birthplace,” he said.