Objections over original audit report


  • Nation
  • Friday, 17 Jan 2020

KUALA LUMPUR: The original 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) audit report findings were objected to by its chief executive officer (CEO) and a group of civil servants during a coordination meeting chaired in 2016 by Tan Sri Dr Ali Hamsa, the chief secretary to the government at the time.

The former director of the National Audit Department (NAD), Saadatul Nafisah Bashir Ahmad, 65, who revealed the matter to the High Court here yesterday, said the meeting took place on Feb 24,2016, at Ali’s office in Putrajaya.

The retired top officer of the NAD testified that she and then auditor-general Tan Sri Ambrin Buang had defended the original 1MDB audit report prepared by the department even though its findings were disagreed with by those who attended the meeting.

Saadatul Nafisah said this at the trial of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and former 1MDB CEO Arul Kanda Kandasamy over the tampering of the final audit report of the state-owned sovereign wealth fund.

Under examination-in-chief by lead prosecutor Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram, the witness was referred to a two hour-and-45-minute audio recording purportedly about the meeting during which a decision was made to drop several controversial issues from the report.

Saadatul Nafisah said that during the meeting, one of the attendees, Tan Sri Shukry Mohd Salleh, had voiced out disagreements with the NAD findings.

“What I understood at the time was that he (Shukry) was talking about the contradictions in our findings. The group disagreed with our opinion, ” she said.

Sri Ram: The group disagreed with your report?

Saadatul Nafisah: They disagreed with our opinion, the auditor-general’s (Ambrin) opinion. It was only our opinion, it can be agreed or disagreed with... but as auditors, we need to give our opinion.

To further questioning, Saadatul Nafisah agreed that if it was not for the Feb 24,2016, meeting, the original 1MDB audit report would not have been changed.

Sri Ram: You were there in the meeting for almost three hours. In your opinion, for whose benefit were the amendments?

Saadatul Nafisah: I think it was more for Tan Sri KSN (Tan Sri Ali Hamsa at the time) and the nation, as it might affect the country and the share market also... some of the sensitive issues (in the audit report) were not to be raised.

Sri Ram: If you look at page 95 of the transcript of the audio recording, Ali said ‘we want to take care of our leadership’. What do you understand by this?

Saadatul Nafisah: The prime minister.

Sri Ram: Do you know who the chairman of the board of advisers of 1MDB was?

Saadatul Nafisah: The minister of finance (MOF)

Sri Ram: The MOF happens to be the PM?

Saadatul Nafisah: Yes, Najib

Najib, 67, is charged with using his position to order amendments to the 1MDB final audit report before it was presented before the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to avoid any action being taken against him, while Arul Kanda is charged with abetting Najib in making amendments to the report, to protect Najib from being subjected to action.

Both men have been charged under provisions of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, which carry a maximum jail term of 20 years and a fine of no less than five times the amount of gratification or RM10,000, whichever is higher, upon conviction.

The trial before judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan continues tomorrow. — Bernama

Article type: free
User access status:

1MDB , Najib ,

   

Across The Star Online