Europe’s defenceless corner


A file photo of people walking in front of the Moldova-Ukraine border crossing point of Palanca-Maiaki in the village of Palanca, at the border between Moldova and Ukraine. Since the start of the conflict, Moldova has recorded dozens of violations of its airspace, and several Russian missiles and drones have crashed on its territory. — AFP

THE Moldovan border town of Palanca felt the full horror of the war in neighbou­ring Ukraine one December day.

A mother was killed and her three child­ren wounded by a Russian drone as they drove over the border bridge across the river Dniester into this previously quiet corner of southeast Moldova, Ukrainian officials said.

“We are right across from there, and it terrified us,” villager Maria Morari, 62, said of the two days of attacks on the crossing.

Like many in Palanca, she is worried that the war could spill over. The border village is on the strategic road running to the Ukrainian port of Odesa.

Moldova’s airspace has been violated dozens of times since the invasion four years ago, with several Russian missiles and drones crashing on its territory, one of them an Iranian-designed Shahed suicide drone, carrying 50kg of explosives, which came down 12km northwest of Palanca in January.

The small, poor and divided ex-Soviet republic – that is neither part of Nato nor the European Union – had to temporarily close its airspace several times.

Even on quiet days, Palanca’s 2,000 ­people have to do without GPS as the Ukrainians jam communications during air raid alerts across the border.

Some nights when the strikes get really loud, Morari said she thought about taking shelter in the basement or even “abandoning everything we have worked for” and fleeing to the capital Chisinau.

“My house often shakes” during the attacks on the other side of the river, said 68-year-old pensioner Valeriu Voloh.

“A fool could easily make a mistake push­ing the launch button and then it falls somewhere in Palanca,” he said.

Yet, Moldova is virtually defenceless, he added.

“We must defend ourselves, but with what? With a pitchfork? With a slingshot?” he said.

The country – one of Europe’s poorest – spends only 0.6% of its GDP on defence, a percentage that Finance Minister Andrian Gavrilita admits places Moldova “at the tail end on the planet”.

It ranks 134 in terms of military strength out of the total 145 countries in the Global Firepower list.

The country has 20 Soviet-era radars which can’t detect drones.

Moldova received a Thales radar system from France in 2023 and is expecting another this year, acquired with EU money from a €20mil package meant to finance air defence launchers and missiles.

Moldova has long been torn between Europe and Russia. While it hopes to conclude EU accession talks by 2028, less than a quarter of its 2.4 million people would vote to join Nato, according to a recent survey.

“Investments in defence are investments in peace, stability and confidence,” pro-EU President Maia Sandu wrote on Facebook after visiting a new military site under construction near Chisinau.

Sandu has frequently accused Moscow of interfering in the country’s affairs, ­especially during elections.

But with pro-Russian politicians mocking drone incursions and constantly criticising army spending as they warn of the “militarisation” of Moldova, not everyone is convinced that its defences must be boosted.

In northern Moldova, the village of Cuhurestii de Jos suddenly found itself in the international spotlight in November when a drone marked with a red letter “Z” was found on a roof in a walnut orchard.

It was later put on display outside Moldo­va’s foreign ministry when Mos­cow’s envoy was summoned over the crash, which came on a day several other drones crossed into the country’s airspace.

But some in the village are deeply sceptical of whether Russia had anything to do with the drone, including the local priest, Sebastian Resetnic, 35.

Affiliated with the Orthodox church aligned to the Moscow Patriarchate, he wondered if the drone “came on its own or (if) someone brought it”.

For 41-year-old Mariana Racu, the drone was “placed carefully, slowly” on the roof to cause panic or test people’s reaction.

She echoed talking points by pro-Russian politicians who called the drone “a turbo ladybug” and accused Sandu’s pro-EU ruling party PAS of having “gently placed” the drone on the roof “to cover up recent scandals”.

“There is still little understanding within (Moldovan) society that investment in defence is... not money thrown away,” said military expert Artur Lescu in Chisi­nau, adding “misinformation narratives” made some people “hide from reality”.

The repeated drone incursions – like those in Romania or Poland – are part of “a psychological war” designed to “sow unrest”, he said.

“Moldova has no capacity whatsoever to stop these missiles,” said Armand Gosu, a Romanian historian who specialises in ­former Soviet countries.

If Moscow wins in Ukraine, “Russia could very easily destabilise Moldova,” he said. “Everything could collapse like a house of cards.” — AFP

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Focus

The Vatican’s eternal artisans
The agony of rising from ruins
Locked away for months
Breaking the fear barrier: Why the Gulf states should reset ties with Tehran
Activating shield mode
Break the barriers
Sustaining women in the workforce means rethinking care and policy
Banking on a stable future
Beyond the numbers
Riches beneath Antarctica’s ice

Others Also Read