Indonesia: Time to sign refugee treaty?


A newly arrived Rohingya refugee wading out to the shore after the local community decided to temporarily allow them to land for water and food in Ulee Madon, Aceh, Indonesia, on Nov 16, 2023. — AFP This article was published in thejakartapost.com with the title "Time to sign refugee treaty". Click to read: https://www.thejakartapost.com/opinion/2023/11/22/time-to-sign-refugee-treaty.html. Download The Jakarta Post app for easier and faster news access: Android: http://bit.ly/tjp-android iOS: http://bit.ly/tjp-ios

THE recent arrivals in Indonesia of Rohingya refugees fleeing from Myanmar (pic) have, surprisingly, been met by opposition from local people in Aceh. On previous occasions, the Acehnese warmly welcomed the Rohingyas on humanitarian grounds, and to a degree in the name of Islamic brotherhood.

It seems the Acehnese welcome has worn thin.

For many years the Rohingyas have landed and been accommodated in several places in Indonesia’s westernmost province. Some have given their hosts a headache by absconding from their shelters, committing petty crimes, and even getting involved in human trafficking.

Despite not being a party to the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, Indonesia has always welcomed asylum seekers. In the late 1970s, at the end of the US misadventure in Vietnam, there was a mass exodus from the former South Vietnam of people escaping the new communist regime.

Indonesia provided Galang Island off Batam, then under the central government’s direct authority, to house those boat people awaiting resettlement in Western countries. About 250,000 refugees lived in the camps, which were jointly administered by the Indonesian government and the world refugee body, the UNHCR, on the island from 1979 to 1996.

About 250,000 Vietnamese refugees lived in the refugee camps, which were jointly administered by the Indonesian government and the world refugee body, the UNHCR, on the island from 1979 to 1996.

After that, Indonesia again tackled a new wave of refugees from Afghanistan and Iraq, who fled their homes following the US invasions. Many of the refugees are still awaiting resettlement in Western countries, which by now seem reluctant to receive more asylum seekers, especially after the Russian invasion of Ukraine last year.

Western countries’ reluctance hardened following the 2012 Syrian civil war, citing incompatibility in cultures and values as reasons to reject refugees from the Middle East.

As of May, the UNHCR recorded more than 12,000 refugees sheltering in Indonesia, awaiting their resettlement process.

Despite its limitations Indonesia has tried its best to accommodate the refugees, who mostly come from Muslim-majority countries. Having no obligations at all under international law to host refugees, Indonesia sees its responsibility lying in the second principle of its ideology Pancasila: “A Just and Civilised Humanity”.

Despite a weaker economy and a higher unemployment rate, Indonesia has done much more than some signatories of the refugee convention – Australia, for example, keeps turning back boats trying to reach its shores.

Australia even intervened by offering fishermen in East Nusa Tenggara a change in profession in a pre-emptive effort to cut the transportation link from Indonesia.

Many Western countries have pushed Indonesia to sign and ratify the 1951 UN convention, to transfer their responsibilities onto Indonesia, making it this country’s official burden to receive the refugees, despite the refugees not wishing to stay here.

As Indonesia’s economy has improved, signified by its return to middle-income nation status and its plan to join the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development, the government should rethink its refusal to sign the 1951 convention.

Not only because Indonesia has sufficient resources to host the refugees, despite the fact that almost none of them want to settle here, but allowing refugees to stay will allow us to claim the higher moral ground vis a vis Western countries.

Indonesia has simply to walk the talk.

The second principle of Pancasila on humanitarianism justifies Indonesia’s decision to accept the refugees, which is also in line with the preamble of the 1945 Constitution, which says: “To participate toward the establishment of a world order based on freedom, perpetual peace and social justice.”

Accepting refugees, however, would not abolish the need to solve the root cause of any conflicts that cause the exodus.

Nevertheless, it would show Indonesia’s seriousness in helping to alleviate the refugees’ burdens while at the same time working on peaceful solutions in their home countries. — The Jakarta Post/Asia News Network

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Focus

Sitting pretty despite trade dispute
Inside India’s grip on US generics
Fighting blind in the reeds
The hunter becomes a lame duck
The film Israel doesn’t want to see
Mutiny in the Tata boardroom
Niche vanilla finds fans in far-off lands
Malaysia’s data centres, costs and spillovers
When seeing is no longer believing
Pragmatic autonomy: Navigating the next chapter of Malaysia-US defence ties

Air Pollutant Index

Note: API is calculated based on 24hr running average of the most dominant parameter.

Highest API Readings

    Select State and Location to view the latest API reading

    Others Also Read