Finding positives in the negatives


A balanced communication of positive and negative footprints of a business’ impact on society is crucial to address critical concerns.

BUSINESSES have been made to believe that carbon offset schemes could help companies reduce emissions and balance out carbon footprints. From the viewpoint of detractors, offsetting is a form of greenwashing which allows companies to claim success in cutting emissions or achieving carbon neutrality.

Investigations and studies have questioned the efficacy of carbon offsets schemes being conducted by conglomerates and other corporations. These, they say, could worsen climate change, as there isn’t a standardised system for determining what counts as a carbon offset, or how to measure it.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In ESG

Researchers eye AI revolution in natural disaster forecasts
All eyes on New York Fashion Week as its first full fur ban takes effect
UN:�AI data centres pose growing threat to electricity systems
Climate Change Bill balances mitigation, adaptation, says ministry
China is building an AI future far from its biggest cities
AI data centres are less thirsty now, tech giants say
AI's boom is draining global water supplies – what should users know?
AI’s environmental impact per task balloons with more complexity
AI boom is testing tech firms' climate pledges
Harvard is selling a US$699 course taught by AI clones of its faculty

Others Also Read