Why Ford expands partnership with top Chinese battery maker


With its CATL partnership, Ford expects to claim valuable federal tax credits while also leveraging Chinese innovation. — Bloomberg

FORD Motor Co cut back its electric vehicle (EV) plans last week in a major announcement, but it simultaneously placed a big bet on a new business line: producing batteries for energy storage.

The pivot was made possible by Ford’s unique access to Chinese technology.

When it set out to delve deeper into the EV battery business in 2023, the company inked a deal with Chinese battery juggernaut Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (CATL) to license its lithium iron phosphate (LFP) technology.

Under the new plan, it will leverage the same deal to produce larger-scale batteries for stationary storage. 

“Given the fact that we already had a licence to build that technology in the United States, you couple that with our manufacturing experience, over a century of high-scale manufacturing, it just made a lot of sense as a natural adjacency for us,” Lisa Drake, Ford’s vice-president of technology platform programmes and EV systems, said in a Dec 15 briefing where the automaker announced the overhaul of its EV strategy. 

The move is part of a trend of battery makers in North America switching from products for EVs to those for grid and data centre use.

EV economics have dimmed after President Donald Trump slashed support for the industry.

Electricity demand in the United States, meanwhile, is projected to rise 12% by 2030, with demand from data centres accounting for more than a third of that increase, according to BloombergNEF. 

Ford’s foray into big batteries is not only a first for the US automaker, but also an experiment in how much Chinese tech should feature in US industrial policy.

With its CATL partnership, Ford expects to claim valuable federal tax credits while also leveraging Chinese innovation – an acrobatic feat under former President Joe Biden that has become almost impossible under Trump.

The US market has been a sought-after destination for China’s world-leading battery makers, but it has also been a political minefield.

After years of local opposition and national security concerns from US lawmakers, a subsidiary of Chinese battery company Gotion scrapped its plans to build a plant in Michigan this fall, according to the state.

A few months prior,  Chinese-owned battery maker Automotive Energy Supply Corp paused construction on  a plant in Kentucky. 

Ford has also faced headwinds.

Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin rejected the automaker’s potential plans to build a battery plant using CATL technology in his state.

It also came under heat from Republicans in Congress and in Michigan, but its plant remains under construction in the state and is expected to open next year. The company tested the waters in Washington, DC before making its Kentucky announcement.

Because imported Chinese batteries are already widely used for energy storage in the United States and the project fits within the Trump administration’s goals to reduce reliance on key Chinese inputs, Ford  felt comfortable moving forward, according to a source.

“Given the ongoing needs of US energy producers, it seems like a no-brainer to support efforts to produce batteries in America instead of importing more of them from China,” Ford said.

Potential customers

Ford also checked with potential customers to see if there would be a market for an automaker selling energy storage cells and received resounding affirmation.

The company originally got into its partnership with CATL because LFP batteries are a low-cost alternative to traditional EV batteries, helping address one of the biggest impediments to consumer adoption – the high price of battery-powered cars.

LFP cells, it turns out, are also the technology of choice in the growing energy storage market.

While Trump’s July tax law cut most of Biden’s other clean energy subsidies, it maintained them for batteries. But to qualify for the benefits, companies will have to comply with limits on using Chinese technology, including through licensing deals.

Critically for Ford, that restriction applies to deals signed after the law’s passage, which spares its CATL partnership. The deal will still have to adhere to a separate set of conditions to get tax credits, and Ford is confident the partnership will comply.

“Our business model is fully compliant with all legal requirements, and consistent with the administration’s policy to promote US energy independence,” Ford said in a statement.

Energy transition

Ford’s expansion is “part of the existing licensing agreement,” a CATL representative said in a statement, adding “we are committed to supporting energy transition across the globe, including the US market, where we see rapidly growing demand for battery energy storage.” 

US companies can still license Chinese battery technology, but they would lose out on tax credits – at least for now.

The Treasury Department is expected to finalise the rules early next year. In the meantime, the CATL deal gives Ford “a kind of rare comparative advantage,” said Derrick Flakoll, senior policy associate at BloombergNEF. —Bloomberg

Lili Pike and Keith Naughton write for Bloomberg. The views expressed here are the writers’ own.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Insight

AI bubble unlikely to pop in 2026
Oil’s geopolitical premium vanished in 2025 and may not return
Forwarded as received: Why we are ‘stupid’ again
Is South Korea betting too much on AI?
Which bullish 2026 equity plays do not require AI euphoria?
The Malaysian tax landscape in 2026
Easy money defined Asia in 2025 but it is getting harder now
Cocoa prices fall. Why isn’t chocolate cheaper?
AI boom brings flood of debt to ultrasafe market
Bracing for slower growth in 2026

Others Also Read