US move can’t suppress growth of Chinese firms


New additions to the US 1260H list include eCommerce giant Alibaba Group, carmaker BYD, robotics startup Unitree, optical enterprise Zhongji Innolight and electronics provider BOE. — China Daily

SHANGHAI: The United States’ recent move to suppress more Chinese companies will not affect the world’s growing demand for Chinese-made solar panels, electric vehicles and industrial robots, which are both quality-oriented and cost-efficient, experts say.

Last week, the US Department of Defence updated its list of so-called Chinese military-linked companies under Section 1260H of the National Defence Authorisation Act, bringing the total to 188 Chinese entities, including 80 parent companies.

The revision, submitted on June 8 and published two days later, expanded coverage beyond the traditional defence and infrastructure sectors into electric vehicles (EVs), artificial intelligence, semiconductors, batteries, biotech, robotics and renewable energy.

New additions to the 1260H list include eCommerce giant Alibaba Group, carmaker BYD, robotics startup Unitree, optical enterprise Zhongji Innolight and electronics provider BOE.

The list also names Chinese AI company SenseTime, battery maker CALB, solar manufacturer Trina Solar, biotech company WuXi AppTec and networking equipment maker TP-Link, among others.

The move does not directly restrict commercial operations in the United States, but it prohibits the Pentagon’s procurement from these listed entities and increases compliance risks across global supply chains.

Jin Zhen, an assistant researcher at Renmin University of China’s Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, said that the United States appears to be expanding the list “to include companies with strong commercial competitiveness and technological capabilities, even when their primary businesses are civilian in nature”.

She noted that some of the entities were added to the list just because they are China’s “little giant companies”, a national title bestowed upon small and medium enterprises to encourage innovation.

The United States cited the title as one of the factors in assessing “potential military connections”, which is obviously unreasonable, she said.

“As Chinese companies continue to grow, the United States is increasingly seeking to limit their access to advanced technology, capital and market resources,” Jin added.

Zhang Sinan, an independent commentator who has been following developments in international relations for years, said the United States’ recent move will not stop the world from needing “cheaper clean energy, more efficient EVs, more advanced drug development services and more flexible robotic applications”, which are provided by China.

BYD said that there is “no legitimate basis” for its inclusion on the 1260H list, as the company is neither a Chinese military enterprise nor a military-civilian integration entity within China’s defence industry.

Meanwhile, Alibaba said that it will take “all available legal measures” against any attempts to misrepresent its business or corporate identity.

Notably, 10 entities have been removed from the 1260H list, including subsidiaries of China Communications Construction and China National Offshore Oil Corp.

After the list was first published in 2021, a group of Chinese companies filed federal lawsuits against the decision and won the cases. — China Daily/ANN

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Business News

Energy security concerns to bolster Uzma’s outlook
Sound prospects for Eckem on increasing production capacity
El Nino, export controls to boost CPO prices
Oil price slide offers�big disinflation boost
Langat 2 flows into second phase
ECB: Iran deal isn’t enough to fix energy shock
Tech rally to spur selective bets
HSBC, Google AI tie up to add US$100mil gains
SpaceX set to overtake Amazon in value as it soars
QL confident of high profit growth

Others Also Read