The proposal would lower a bank holding company’s capital requirement under the eSLR to a range of 3.5% to 4.5%, down from the current 5%. — Bloomberg
WASHINGTON: The top US bank regulators plan to reduce a key capital buffer by up to 1.5 percentage points for the biggest lenders after concerns that it constrained their trading in the US$29 trillion Treasuries market.
The Federal Reserve (Fed), Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) are focusing on what’s known as the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR ), according to people briefed on the discussions.
This rule applies to the largest US banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co, Goldman Sachs Group Inc and Morgan Stanley.
The proposal would lower a bank holding company’s capital requirement under the eSLR to a range of 3.5% to 4.5%, down from the current 5%, according to the people, who didn’t want to be identified discussing nonpublic information.
The firms’ banking subsidiaries would also likely see their requirement reduced to the same range, down from the current 6%, the people said.
The revisions resemble those from 2018, when President Donald Trump’s regulators sought to “tailor” the eSLR calculation that applied to US global systemically important banks, according to the people familiar with the matter.
The people said the proposal’s language could still change.
The proposal will look to change the overall ratio rather than exclude specific assets like Treasuries, as some observers had predicted.
Still, it’s expected to ask for public comment on whether the agencies should carve out Treasuries from the calculation, the people said.
The Fed said on Tuesday that it plans to meet on June 25 to discuss the plan.
The other regulators hadn’t yet announced their agendas on the enhanced version of the SLR.
Representatives for the Fed, FDIC and OCC declined to comment.
Fed chair Jerome Powell and other officials supported possible revisions to the SLR standards in a bid to bolster banks’ roles as intermediaries in the market.
In February, he told the House Financial Services Committee that he had been “somewhat concerned about the levels of liquidity in the Treasury market” for a long time.
In April, Trump’s tariffs rattled the markets, sharpening investors’ focus on the SLR standards.
The industry has said the rule, which requires large lenders to hold capital against their investments in Treasuries, crimps their ability to add to those securities in times of volatility, as they are treated in line with much riskier assets.
The SLR’s applicability to Treasuries was suspended during the Covid crisis, but it has since been reinstated.
Leverage ratios are intended to act as a “backstop” to risk-based capital requirements, Fed’s vice chair for supervision Michelle Bowman said earlier this month.
“When leverage ratios become the binding capital constraint at an excessive level, they can create market distortions,” she added.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has pointed to estimates that tweaking the rule could reduce Treasury yields by tens of basis points.
Still, it’s unclear whether easing the leverage ratio would encourage banks to buy more Treasuries, said Jeremy Kress, a former Fed bank-policy attorney who now teaches business law at the University of Michigan.
“When regulators temporarily excluded Treasuries from the leverage ratio in 2020, most banks chose not to take advantage of this exclusion because doing so would have triggered restrictions on their ability to pay dividends and buy back shares,” Kress said.
“This experience suggests that if banks get additional balance sheet capacity from leverage ratio changes, they’re more likely to use it for capital distributions to shareholders rather than for Treasury market intermediation.” — Bloomberg
