Insight - Let’s fix the public procurement system


Lee Heng Guie: Public procurement, which involves large sums of spending money, is highly vulnerable to procurement fraud and corruption. Among the types of procurement fraud are conflict of interest, bid-rigging, and awarding contracts to unqualified contractors and rent seekers and cronies.

THE news flow that a syndicate has monopolised government projects through tenders/quotations worth more than RM3.8bil since 2014 until now is mind-boggling.

The failings uncovered in the public procurement system may be the “tip of the iceberg” and calls for the government to expedite public procurement reforms.

The mismanagement of public procurement as well as misappropriation of public money for private gains has a long history. Corruption in public procurement has enormous negative consequences as it diverts public funds into unproductive, inappropriate, and uneconomical projects.

Worse still, some of these abuses of public funds were undetected, and taxes were unpaid.

Such monetary transaction is considered as shadow economic and business activities.

In many Auditor-General’s annual reports, the Auditor-General had spelt out issues concerning the abuses and irregularities in public procurement.

These include myriad problems of wastage, overpricing, cost overruns, delays, and sub-standard quality in the final delivery of projects.

Public procurement, which involves large sums of spending money, is highly vulnerable to procurement fraud and corruption.

Among the types of procurement fraud are conflict of interest, bid-rigging, and awarding contracts to unqualified contractors and rent seekers and cronies.

According to the World Bank (2015), governments in developing countries had spent on average 15% to 20% of gross domestic product (GDP) buying goods and services and building public infrastructure and facilities such as schools, airports, rails, utilities, roads, and hospitals.

It is estimated that between 10% and 30% of the investment in publicly funded construction projects may be lost through mismanagement and corruption.

Malaysia spends more than RM150bil (equivalent to almost one-fifth of total GDP) each year in procuring goods, works and services. It is believed that 30% can be saved if leakages and wastage are cut.

Malaysia’s public procurement system and process is critically in need of fixing and reforms.

We have wondered why it is that whenever the government tries to buy anything it ends up being weirdly expensive, slow, and quite often, not meeting the specifications and requirements.

We need to tackle transparency and integrity risks in the management of government contracts not only to achieve public spending efficiency gains in providing a better quality of service to the public, but also to optimise scarce public resources and reduce wastage to rebuild government savings.

Complex issue

Public procurement is a complex matter. The Finance Ministry has set the rules and regulations to govern the government’s procurement practices, which are governed by the Financial Procedure Act, Government Contract Act, Treasury Instructions, Treasury circulars and Federal Central Contract circulars.

In the tabling of Budget 2019, the government had proposed to introduce the Government Procurement Act (GPA) in 2019 to ensure transparency and open competition, accompanied by open tender practices and punitive action for any abuse of power in relation to contract issuance.

The National Anti-Corruption Procurement’s (NACP) target of 2023 for the enactment of the GPA should be fast tracked.

The engagement with stakeholders and public is paramount to ensure that the reformed procurement legislation will provide a more predictable, reliable, and trusted government procurement system.

Modern system needed

The fundamental tenets of designing a coherent, sound, and modern government procurement system are as follows:

> Maintain an open, fair and market competitive bidding process. Direct negotiation is restricted and for security and uniformity purposes, institutionalise public disclosure practices of procurement activities to promote transparency and accountability.

> Continued enhancement of an e-procurement system, which is a key component in the reform and modernisation of public procurement framework. The use of e-procurement can be very efficient in increasing competition and transparency and hence, can greatly help in reducing corruption in public procurement.

> A central purchasing body that acquires goods or services covering goods and services of common interest, such as in office supplies and pharmaceuticals. Savings can be realised in terms of better prices and lower transaction costs.

> Increase transparency and accessibility to public records and documents. The necessary administrative measures to preserve integrity in accounting books, records, and financial statements.

> The use of objective and predetermined criteria for public procurement decisions, to facilitate the subsequent verification of the correct application of the rules or procedures.

> Develop a risk indicator system with red flags signalling potential problems in the procurement process.

> Invest in professionalism, including promoting the integrity of officers handling the procurement function. Develop a national training and forensic auditing skill in scrutinising public procurement.

> A whistle-blower protection mechanism to safeguard citizens and private firms in monitoring public procurement functions to detect procurement bypasses committed by civil servants.

> Establish an Independent Oversight Commission to oversee the procurement process in combating corruption and abuse of government procurement. These include the strict enforcement of punitive action for any abuse of power in relation to contract issuance and hold the contractors accountable for the undeliverable of projects as well as the blacklisting and debarring of errant contractors.

An important area of reform is to enhance the transparency in the public procurement system, which has been marred by political interference.

The evaluation, selection and awarding of contracts have been often influenced by the lobbying of politicians and businesses having vested interests to which they are connected.

Lee Heng Guie is the executive director of the Socio Economic Research Centre. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Business News

Should Malaysia rescue AirAsia?
IOIPG Malaysia REIT fixes IPO price at 91 sen per unit
Pharmaniaga’s 3Q net profit more than triples to RM26.9mil
PIE Industrial sharpens focus on cost and operational efficiency
EcoWorld, NS Corp, eyes potential partnership to develop industrial water supply solutions
Malaysia hits RM4.16bil in approved MRO investments as of June 2026
Ringgit ends higher against major, Asean currencies
Impact Capital IPO oversubscribed by 139.69 times
Keyfield International’s 3Q earnings hold steady at RM41.4mil
Hektar REIT upbeat on growth prospects despite weaker 3Q earnings

Air Pollutant Index

Note: API is calculated based on 24hr running average of the most dominant parameter.

Highest API Readings

    Select State and Location to view the latest API reading

    Others Also Read