AirAsia, AirAsia X file judicial review against Mavcom

  • Business
  • Wednesday, 15 May 2019

AirAsia planes seen here on the KLIA tarmac. – Reuters

PETALING JAYA: AirAsia Bhd and AirAsia X Bhd have filed a judicial review challenging the Malaysian Aviation Commission (Mavcom) for declining to decide its disputes with Malaysia Airport (Sepang) Sdn Bhd (MASSB) pertaining to the passenger service charge (PSC) and poor level of service at KLIA2.

In a statement yesterday, AirAsia said the airlines had also made a claim of RM480mil against MASSB for damages incurred as a result of the poor level of service at KLIA2.

“The airlines maintain that the increased PSC is arbitrary, burdens the travelling public and is unjustified as the levels of service at KLIA2 are inferior to that of KLIA where passengers pay the same charges.

“The airlines have argued that in most countries where low-cost travel has mushroomed, resulting in multiplier effects through tourism spend to these countries, the charges for low-cost airports are significantly lower than that of airports which cater to full-service airlines.”

AirAsia said MASSB has filed several court actions. This, it said, included a defamation lawsuit against the AirAsia group’s top executives for making press statements against MASSB and demanding the airlines (which have refused to collect the increased charges from passengers) pay the uncollected amounts to them.

“AirAsia and AirAsia X both dispute MASSB’s claims and have applied to strike out the actions as they are filed in breach of sections 74 to 78 of the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 (MAVCOM Act).”

AirAsia said the low-cost airlines have tried to engage both MASSB and MAVCOM to resolve the disputes through the statutory dispute structure provided by the MAVCOM Act.

“However, MAVCOM has through two letters dated Feb 28, 2019 and March 18, 2019 refused to decide on the disputes on the basis that ‘the interpretation and applicability of sections 74 and 75 of the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 [Act 711] are currently pending disposal by the Court.

“AirAsia and AirAsia X maintain that under the MAVCOM Act, MAVCOM has a statutory duty to commence to decide on the dispute once mediation between parties has failed, or is deemed to have failed. The refusal to decide on the disputes is therefore contrary to sections 74 to 78 of the MAVCOM Act.”

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights

AirAsia , AirAsia X , judicial , review , MAVcom , Malaysia Airports ,


Next In Business News

US posts weakest growth of pandemic recovery on supply woes
Top Glove cuts targeted Hong Kong listing proceeds again, to US$473mil
Drilling business lifts Icon Offshore Q3 earnings
EP Manufacturing appoints two new directors
UOB Malaysia provides financing to Ericsson Malaysia
Bursa Malaysia ends lower
Warrant of arrest Issued against ex-CEO of Transmile
PMB Investment targets RM10-15mil fund size for Shariah Global Equity Fund by year-end
Shell sets tougher climate targets, Q3 profit below expectations
Bank Pembangunan, MDEC collaborate to catalyse Malaysia's digital economy growth

Others Also Read