JAKARTA: Jakarta faces an escalating threat from land subsidence, which experts warn could leave parts of the city underwater and cause massive economic losses if aggressive mitigation measures are not implemented.
A recent assessment by the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) estimates that Jakarta’s land is sinking at an average rate of 3.5cm per year.
The rate varies across the city, with northern Jakarta experiencing some of the most severe impacts.
Over the past four decades, the area has sunk by as much as 4m, leaving roughly 40 per cent of it below sea level.
“Jakarta’s land is sinking,” said Yus Budiyono, a senior researcher at BRIN. “The northern part is turning into a ‘bowl’ and a flood hotspot, vulnerable to overflowing rivers, torrential rains and encroaching seawater.”
The city’s location on a low-lying delta, where rivers from the southern highlands converge before emptying into Jakarta Bay, already makes it prone to flooding.
Unchecked development and excessive groundwater extraction have only worsened the problem.
Yus estimated that Jakarta loses at least US$186 million (S$239.5 million) annually due to flood risks, a figure projected to rise to US$421 million by 2030 if subsidence continues unabated.
Since 2014, the Jakarta administration and the central government have constructed around 20km of concrete barriers as part of the 46km National Capital Integrated Coastal Development (NCICD) project, aimed at protecting the city from coastal flooding.
President Prabowo Subianto has also announced a multibillion-dollar plan to build the so-called Giant Sea Wall, a 500km megastructure along Java’s northern coast designed to shield flood-prone communities from Banten to East Java.
While the existing seawall in Jakarta has helped limit seawater intrusion compared with unprotected coastal areas such as Demak in Central Java, Yus said such structural measures fail to address the primary driver of land subsidence, which is excessive groundwater extraction.
Many Jakartans still rely heavily on pumped groundwater for domestic use, as the city-owned piped water operator, PAM Jaya, has yet to achieve full coverage.
Groundwater was also widely extracted for industrial purposes before the practice was banned by the government.
“Access to clean water must be fully provided so there is no reason for groundwater extraction,” Yus said, warning that without effective measures to curb land subsidence, even the proposed giant sea wall would offer limited protection.
Bosman Batubara, a research fellow at the Asia Research Institute of National University of Singapore (NUS), agreed, adding that Jakarta’s land subsidence is also driven by rapid but uneven urban development.
Communities that have benefited from decades of urban expansion tend to be less exposed to the impacts of subsidence, while coastal residents face disproportionately higher risks of flooding, land loss and threats to their livelihoods.
“Since the heavy pressures of urban development and deep groundwater extraction are the two main drivers of land subsidence, both must be addressed first,” Bosman said.
However, he argued that the government has yet to tackle these root causes, instead prioritising surface-level solutions such as the construction of concrete seawalls.
In 2021, then-governor Anies Baswedan issued a gubernatorial regulation banning groundwater extraction in nine industrial areas and along 12 roads across the city in an effort to curb worsening subsidence.
The current administration under Governor Pramono Anung is reportedly planning to tighten the regulation further. - The Jakarta Post/ANN
