Sedition Bill finally passed

  • Nation
  • Friday, 10 Apr 2015

THE Sedition (Amendment) Bill 2015 was passed after a long-drawn and contentious debate and a demand by the MPs for changes to be made to it.

At press time, the Bill was being debated at the policy stage.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the changes made to it showed that the Government was sensitive to the issues raised over some provisions.

“That is why we have taken steps to make the changes, which I will be carrying out,” he said when wrapping up his speech on the Bill.

He assured the MPs that the amendments were needed to improve the sedition laws, which included “value added” amendments to allow criticism of the Government and the judiciary.

He defended the Government’s move to retain the sedition laws although there was an assurance that it would be done away with in 2011.

“In light of the recent rise in sedition cases, the Government saw that there was a need to amend the parent Act to improve it,” he said.

Earlier, during the debate, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said (BN-Pengerang) asked whether Malaysia needed incidents of publications that insulted religion, such as the Charlie Hebdo tragedy in France.

“Can you imagine if every week there are similar publications to offend Muslims here on online media?

“Or imagine if there are other forms of mockery on the Prophet and even Jesus Christ in our plural society?”

Azalina chided the Opposition MPs for being perasan (self-centered) for implying that the law would be used against them.

Liang Teck Meng (BN-Simpang Renggam) said freedom of speech had its limits, giving examples of people wishing others Selamat Hari Raya using pictures of bak kut teh or dogs.

Opposition MPs, however, lambasted the proposed amendments, adding that it should never have seen the light of day.

Lim Guan Eng (DAP-Bagan) pointed out there were 16 DAP elected representatives who were investigated or charged for sedition while the one case of Perkasa calling for the burning of Malay language Bibles was dropped.

“The Bill is also an attack on Malaysia’s role in the United Nation’s Human Rights Council, of which Malaysia is a member,” he added.

N. Surendran (PKR-Padang Serai) argued that the definition of “seditious tendency” was too wide and that the decision to prosecute and investigate was based on the whims and fancy of the Inspector General of Police and the Attorney-General.

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 0
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!

dewan rakyat , 13th Parliament , Speaker , politics


Next In Nation

Asst medical officer remanded over bribery in Pahang
Company director charged with offering RM50,000 bribe to police officer
Budget 2023: State govt has requested for RM3bil allocation, says Perak MB
Discussions in progress on AG's successor, says PM
Malaysia sending a second SMART to Turkiye
Covid-19: Parts of vaccine procurement signed off without AG's approval, says Anwar
Logger injured in Terengganu sun bear attack
Temporary closure of Pantai Mawar in Mersing
1MDB trial: My late-night chats with Jho Low was about moving funds to Umno, says ex-banker
Maqis detains container for misleading documents in Johor Baru

Others Also Read