Uber, Lyft win court block on NYC law requiring notice before firing drivers


Uber logo is seen in this illustration taken July 16, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

July 22 (Reuters) - A federal ⁠judge has ruled that New York City cannot prohibit Uber Technologies and Lyft ⁠from deactivating drivers from their apps without advance notice, ruling that the novel ‌law is unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Gregory Woods in Manhattan said in a written ruling on Tuesday that the city's law adopted earlier this year benefits a small fraction of drivers while interfering with the ride-hailing companies' right to ​police the safety of their platforms.

"Uber and Lyft are ⁠likely to succeed in showing that the ⁠law protects a narrow class of drivers and does not advance the broader social or ⁠economic ‌interest which the [U.S.] Constitution requires to permit the severe impairment of their contracts," Woods wrote.

The judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the city from enforcing the law, which ⁠was set to take effect July 28, pending the outcome ​of consolidated lawsuits filed by ‌the companies last month.

Lyft said in a statement provided by a spokesperson that "we're ⁠pleased the court ​recognized the serious safety concerns at the heart of this challenge."

Separately, Uber spokesman Josh Gold said: "The opinion underscores that driver fairness and rider safety can and must go hand in hand.”

The New York City ⁠Law Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The ​law, one of the first of its kind in the U.S., was passed in January after the New York City Council overwhelmingly overrode a veto by former Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat. ⁠Adams had said that the law would create an expensive and unwieldy new bureaucracy to handle wrongful deactivation claims.

The law requires that ride-hailing services give drivers 14 days' notice before deactivating them from apps, with an exception for "egregious misconduct," and potentially rehire drivers deactivated since 2019 solely ​because they did not receive such notice.

Uber and Lyft in ⁠lawsuits filed a day apart in June said that the law violated their due process and ​free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution. They said the ‌law threatened to undermine their reputation and goodwill ​while keeping unsafe drivers, including those accused of sexual misconduct, on the road.

(Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Mark Porter)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Others Also Read