Major publishers sue Meta for copyright infringement over AI training


FILE PHOTO: The logo of Meta is seen during the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo

May 5 (Reuters) - Publishers ⁠Elsevier, Cengage, Hachette, Macmillan and McGraw Hill sued Meta Platforms in Manhattan federal ⁠court on Tuesday, alleging that the tech giant misused their books and ‌journal articles to train its artificial intelligence model Llama.

The publishers, as well as author Scott Turow, alleged in the proposed class action complaint that Meta pirated millions of their works and used them without permission to ​train its large language models to respond to human ⁠prompts.

“AI is powering transformative innovations, productivity ⁠and creativity for individuals and companies, and courts have rightly found that training AI ⁠on ‌copyrighted material can qualify as fair use," a Meta spokesperson responded in a statement on Tuesday.

"We will fight this lawsuit aggressively.”

The publishers allege that Meta pirated ⁠works ranging from textbooks to scientific articles to novels including "The ​Fifth Season" by N.K. ‌Jemisin and "The Wild Robot" by Peter Brown for its AI training. They asked ⁠the court for ​permission to represent a larger class of copyright owners and an unspecified amount of monetary damages.

"Meta’s mass-scale infringement isn’t public progress, and AI will never be properly realized if tech companies prioritize ⁠pirate sites over scholarship and imagination," Maria Pallante, president ​of the Association of American Publishers, said in a statement.

The lawsuit opens a new front in the ongoing copyright battle between creators and tech companies over AI training, in which ⁠dozens of authors, news outlets, visual artists and other plaintiffs have sued companies including Meta, OpenAI and Anthropic for infringement.

All of the pending cases will likely revolve around whether AI systems make fair use of copyrighted material by using it to create new, transformative ​content. The first two judges to consider the matter issued ⁠diverging rulingslast year.

Amazon- and Google-backed Anthropic was the first major AI company to settle one ​of the cases,agreeing last year to pay a group ‌of authors $1.5 billion to resolve a class-action lawsuit ​that could have cost the company billions more in damages for alleged piracy.

(Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington; Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise and Keith Weir)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Others Also Read