Getty Images lawsuit says Stability AI misused photos to train AI


REUTERS/Wolfgang Rattay

(Reuters) - Stock photo provider Getty Images has sued artificial intelligence company Stability AI Inc, accusing it in a lawsuit made public on Monday of misusing more than 12 million Getty photos to train its Stable Diffusion AI image-generation system.

The lawsuit, filed in Delaware federal court, follows a separate Getty case against Stability in the United Kingdom and a related class-action complaint filed by artists in California against Stability and other companies in the fast-growing field of generative AI.

Getty declined to comment on the Delaware lawsuit. Representatives for Stability did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday. Reuters News competes with Getty in the market for images for editorial use.

London-based Stability AI released Stable Diffusion, an AI-based system for generating images from text inputs, and image generator DreamStudio last August. The company announced in October that it had raised over $100 million in funding, and has been valued at $1 billion.

Seattle-based Getty accused Stability of copying millions of its photos without a license and using them to train Stable Diffusion to generate more accurate depictions based on user prompts.

Getty said its pictures are particularly valuable for AI training because of their image quality, variety of subject matter and detailed metadata.

Getty said it has licensed "millions of suitable digital assets" to other "leading technology innovators" for AI-related purposes, and that Stability infringes its copyrights and competes with it unfairly.

The lawsuit also accuses Stability of infringing Getty's trademarks, citing images generated by its AI system with Getty's watermark that Getty says could cause consumer confusion.

Getty asked the court to order Stability to stop using its pictures and requested money damages that include Stability's profits from the alleged infringement.

The case is Getty Images (US) Inc v. Stability AI Inc, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:23-cv-00135.

For Getty: Benjamin Marks and Jared Friedmann of Weil Gotshal & Manges

For Stability: attorney information not available

Read more:

Lawsuits accuse AI content creators of misusing copyrighted work

(Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington)

Article type: free
User access status:
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!

   

Next In Tech News

Video game Baftas spotlight UK's thriving independent scene
Italy blocks AI chatbot ChatGPT over data privacy failings
How AI like ChatGPT could change the future of work, education and our minds
Opinion: Help protect the Internet’s ‘kid influencers’
Preview: 'Redfall' beautifully meshes Arkane’s hallmark gameplay with an open world
Humans vs. machines: the fight to copyright AI art
ChatGPT chats are not confidential, so don't tell it your secrets
Amazon connecting up devices in US homes into one giant wi-fi network
Elon Musk seeks to end $258 billion Dogecoin lawsuit
Rage-tweeting: When angry consumers seek 'revenge' for bad service

Others Also Read