Soccer-New Jersey's $150 transit fare will have 'chilling effect', FIFA warns


People wait to board a NJ Transit train at the Secaucus Junction station on the day of the announcement of public transit ticket prizes to World Cup games in New Jersey, in Secaucus, New Jersey, U.S., April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon

April 18 (Reuters) - New Jersey's decision ⁠to charge $150 for round-trip transit to World Cup games will have a "chilling effect" ⁠on fans, FIFA have warned as the fare represents a 10-fold increase from ‌the usual $15 for the route.

The dramatic price hike adds to the cost of World Cup match tickets, which can run into the thousands of dollars, especially on the resale market. The MetLife Stadium is set ​to host eight matches, including the July 19 final.

New Jersey ⁠Transit CEO Kris Kolluri had defended ⁠the pricing, citing higher passenger volumes due to closed public parking around the stadium ⁠and ‌increased costs from World Cup security requirements.

Heimo Schirgi, the Chief Operating Officer for the 2026 World Cup, said the price increase would force fans to look at ⁠alternative options.

"The NJ Transit current pricing model will have ​a chilling effect. Elevated fares ‌inevitably push fans toward alternative transportation options," Schirgi said in a statement.

"This increases ⁠concerns of congestion, ​late arrivals, and creates broader ripple effects that ultimately diminish the economic benefit and lasting legacy the entire region stands to gain from hosting the World Cup.

"Furthermore, to arbitrarily set elevated prices ⁠and demand FIFA absorb these costs is unprecedented. No ​other global event, concert or major sporting promoter has faced such a demand."

GOVERNOR SAYS 'FIFA SHOULD PAY'

New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill previously said NJ TRANSIT had been "stuck with a $48-million bill" to ensure ⁠fan safety while FIFA was making $11 billion.

"I'm not going to stick New Jersey commuters with that tab for years to come. FIFA should pay for the rides," Sherrill said.

FIFA refuted Sherrill's claim, saying they were generating $11 billion in revenue, not profits.

"FIFA has always been ​a not-for-profit organisation as per our statutes. Revenues from the ⁠FIFA World Cup are reinvested into developing the game of football, particularly for youth and ​women, worldwide," Schirgi added.

"Lastly, we applaud our host city ‌partners across the country who embraced this opportunity ​to showcase their region to visitors by providing low cost and often unchanged rates for mass transit."

(Reporting by Rohith Nair in Bengaluru; editing by Clare Fallon)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Football

Soccer-FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums
Soccer-Liverpool appoint former Bournemouth coach Iraola as manager
Soccer-Neymar skips Cleveland trip with Brazil as he continues recovery
Soccer-DR Congo head to Spain to continue World Cup build-up despite Ebola cancellation
Soccer-Mourinho files European human rights complaint over Turkish fine and ban
Soccer-The perfect pitch is the goal for World Cup grass growers
Soccer-Spain's Novell replaces Hjulmand as Bayer Leverkusen coach
Soccer-Guardiola "quit 100 times" before final exit, says Man City chairman
Fenerbahce chairman jailed for inciting illegal betting
Soccer-Netherlands' loss to Algeria a pre-World Cup wake-up call, says Koeman

Others Also Read