Soccer-Forest unhappy with referee decision before Liverpool's late winner


Soccer Football - Premier League - Nottingham Forest v Liverpool - The City Ground, Nottingham, Britain - March 2, 2024 Nottingham Forest's Matz Sels reacts after sustaining an injury REUTERS/Molly Darlington

(Reuters) - Referee decision not to return the ball to Nottingham Forest after restart, minutes before Liverpool's 99th-minute winner was wrong, Forest's referee analyst said.

Forest's 1-0 home defeat to Liverpool on Saturday ended in chaos after the final whistle with Tierney surrounded by Forest's enraged staff, ultimately resulting in coaching staff member Steven Reid being shown a red card.

Tierney had stopped play due to Liverpool defender Ibrahima Konate's head injury while Forest were attacking and forward Callum Hudson-Odoi was in possession of the ball.

Play was then restarted with an uncontested drop ball that was given to Liverpool goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher, which led to Liverpool progressing up the pitch and eventually winning the match thanks to Darwin Nunez's header.

"The law states that, if the referee is going to stop the game – which he is entitled to for a head injury – the ball has to go back to the team that has possession. Forest clearly had possession," Forest's referee analyst Mark Clattenburg told reporters on Saturday.

"What we will be doing is speaking to the PGMOL (Professional Game Match Officials Limited), with my relationships that I have with the PGMOL and the Premier League, and we will discuss what happened on the field of play today, and we will look at the course of action in the future.

"The owner (Evangelos Marinakis) is quite upset... he wants to see results and he feels that another decision has gone against the club."

Liverpool manager Juergen Klopp said Tierney had made the same decision against his team earlier in the half.

"This happened exactly the same way as it did in the first half, just the other way round... I would now assume that is the rule," Klopp said on Saturday.

"I understand the anger from Nottingham of course... It happened twice and it was handled exactly the same, so I don't really see the reason for the discussions."

(Reporting by Shifa Jahan in Bengaluru; Editing by Jamie Freed)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Football

Soccer-Tottenham gloom deepens, Man Utd salvage point at West Ham
Soccer-West Ham stalemate a hair-raising result for Manchester United fan
Soccer-Pressure off Newcastle boss but heaped on Spurs’ Thomas Frank
Soccer-Chelsea suffer familiar failings as Leeds battle back for 2-2 draw
Soccer-Sesko breaks West Ham hearts to rescue point for Man Utd
Soccer-Aouar drives rampant Al-Ittihad into Asian Champions League knockout rounds
Soccer-Kobe down FC Seoul to advance, Hiroshima, Machida also progress in Asian Champions League
Soccer-Man City's Guardiola shrugs off title speculation, calls for more consistency
Ten-man JDT beaten 2-1 by Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Soccer-Liverpool performances not up to the club's standards, Slot says

Others Also Read