Mediation a complement to litigation


THERE have been grouses among the public over the inordinate and inexcusable delay in the disposal of cases in the courts. Too often, blame has been levelled on the courts when, in fact, there are other factors that have equally contributed to the delay. These include unnecessary requests for adjournments, transfer of judges or judicial officers, lack of court interpreters, and loss of evidence or exhibits in court.

In some cases, even the courts have raised concern over delays in the settlement of disputes. In Khairul Faezah bt Haji Abdul Majid v Muhamad Salleh bin Bidin (2004), there was a delay of approximately four years in the settlement of the dispute. The Syariah High Court stated inter alia that if only all the parties had acted accordingly, it would have saved the time of the proceeding of this case. The parties and their counsels were urged to be serious in settling the dispute, without unnecessary request for adjournment, as the parties and the general public would place the blame of any delay on the court.

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Letters; Law; mediation

   

Next In Letters

Fire and Rescue Department personnel deserve better pay
Buyers, beware of fake dietary supplements online
Digital citizenship in the age of artificial intelligence
Equitable pay raises for all vital for economic parity
Malaysian Indians just want their fundamental rights to be acknowledged and fulfilled
Addressing issues in plastic recycling
Example for all Malaysians
Education system still wanting
There’s focus on patriotism
Benefits of a strong IP system

Others Also Read