When euthanasia is a better option

REFERRING to the StarMetro report “Injured dogs from MDDB safe from euthanasia” (April 7), the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association would like to point out that the headline is misleading and appears to demonise the true purpose and value of the act of euthanasia on an animal.

“Euthanasia” literally means “good death” as the animal is put down within just two or three seconds by a qualified veterinary doctor to end its suffering. It is administered not only on animals suffering from end-stage cancer and other incurable diseases but also in other instances.

For example, dogs and cats are put down by local councils when re-homing attempts fail and there are no other viable options available.

It may also be the best option for the geriatric pets of elderly people who are incapacitated by age-related problems and are no longer able to look after their animals. If these pets are unable to settle down with a new owner, some of them would stay off food and eventually die. In such circumstances, the kindest alternative would be to euthanise the animal.

We do not support the practice of keeping disabled dogs alive unless a veterinarian approves it. Another consideration is the quality and status of veterinary care in Malaysia which is still basic compared to more developed countries where disabled dogs have access to veterinarians who are specialised in animal rehabilitation.

Disabled dogs need extra care as their condition will only deteriorate over time. They will need daily hydrotherapy (swimming) to prevent muscle atrophy, special medication to treat pressure sores and keep away deadly infections that normal dogs don’t face – the list is endless.

Finally, injured and handicapped dogs need privacy and peace to live out their years. They should never be exploited by anyone, including animal welfare groups, for fund-raising events.

ANTHONY THANASAYAN

President

Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association