Boosting Asean centrality


For years, successive US administrations have sought partisan support from South-East Asian countries, but a neutral Asean has refused to choose a side. — Bernama

FOR too long, the Asean region has been policy-rich but institutionally poor. There is much to do with many policies for getting things done, but little by way of regional frameworks for doing them cohesively and comprehensively.

Asean itself emerged after failed attempts at indigenously-led regionalism: the Association of South-East Asia (Asa) and Maphilindo (Malaya, the Philip-pines, and Indonesia). Since then Asean has succeeded admirably, but it has always needed to do more.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Columnists

Why comparing Malaysian Chinese to Palestinians is misguided
Mindef under the spotlight
When returns inspire in badminton and raise doubts in football
Are top teams in EPL getting weaker or are mid-table sides getting better?
University Malaya leading development of affordable diagnostics and therapeutics for Malaysia and Asean
Medical sovereignty: Malaysia should not automatically accept US FDA approvals
Financing the future: China’s influence on green finance
Rooting out the causes of early release
Who’s afraid of Akmal Salleh?
Anwar’s fast-track reform push starts early

Others Also Read