Boosting Asean centrality


For years, successive US administrations have sought partisan support from South-East Asian countries, but a neutral Asean has refused to choose a side. — Bernama

FOR too long, the Asean region has been policy-rich but institutionally poor. There is much to do with many policies for getting things done, but little by way of regional frameworks for doing them cohesively and comprehensively.

Asean itself emerged after failed attempts at indigenously-led regionalism: the Association of South-East Asia (Asa) and Maphilindo (Malaya, the Philip-pines, and Indonesia). Since then Asean has succeeded admirably, but it has always needed to do more.

Unlock 30% Savings on Ad-Free Access Now!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM9.73 only

Billed as RM9.73 for the 1st month then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month
RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60 for the 1st year then RM148 thereafters.

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Columnists

Asia-Pacific news agencies seek cooperation to tackle global changes, tech challenges
The moral case for GST
An inconvenient baggage for DAP
Navigating hybrid payment future
Deterrence unscripted: What the Iran–Israel escalation really revealed
When gang turf wars go public
A different perspective on housing
Stop the fighting in associations, focus on competing in the arena
Liverpool’s Wirtz gamble – masterstroke or mistake in the making?
Global civilisation initiative: The Asean multicultural model

Others Also Read