Frank talks and frustration: How the U.S. got to yes on Abrams tanks


FILE PHOTO: U.S. Army M1A1 Abrams tank fires during NATO enhanced Forward Presence battle group military exercise Crystal Arrow 2021 in Adazi, Latvia March 26, 2021 REUTERS/Ints Kalnins/File Photo

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - They are expensive and hard to maintain. They run on jet fuel. And they are difficult to operate.

The U.S. Pentagon presented its best arguments, publicly and privately, against sending Abrams - its most advanced battle tanks - to Ukraine.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In World

Zelenskiy to meet Witkoff after Trump says Russia has been 'fine' on Ukraine
As France erupts, Europe's far right gains from fuel-price anger ahead of elections
Attack on Australian politician follows years of threats to public figures
Drone strike in disputed Sudan-South Sudan area kills dozens, minister says
Declared dead: Indian voters fight to get back on electoral rolls
Paris police issue overnight curfew in 2 areas of French capital to try to prevent further disorder
Seoul vows 'resolute punishment' after North Korea threatens new border measures
Cuba accuses US of letting terrorists operate with impunity after speedboat raid
Killing of former anti-graft prosecutor a grim milestone in Guatemala's political violence
14 dead, 7 injured in Colombia illegal gold mine collapse

Air Pollutant Index

Note: API is calculated based on 24hr running average of the most dominant parameter.

Highest API Readings

    Select State and Location to view the latest API reading

    Others Also Read