Frank talks and frustration: How the U.S. got to yes on Abrams tanks


FILE PHOTO: U.S. Army M1A1 Abrams tank fires during NATO enhanced Forward Presence battle group military exercise Crystal Arrow 2021 in Adazi, Latvia March 26, 2021 REUTERS/Ints Kalnins/File Photo

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - They are expensive and hard to maintain. They run on jet fuel. And they are difficult to operate.

The U.S. Pentagon presented its best arguments, publicly and privately, against sending Abrams - its most advanced battle tanks - to Ukraine.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In World

Russia says it struck five vessels in Ukraine's Black Sea ports
Canada announces retaliatory tariffs on $20 billion worth of US goods, unveils support measures
Exclusive-Ukraine needs changes to avoid losing war, ousted defence minister says
Trump says Strait of Hormuz has been demined, warns Iran not to plant more
US spy chief visits Russia for meetings, media reports
US military transport plane lands in Moscow, Kremlin says it has no information yet
Trump threatens to change the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America amid Canada trade war
Landmark ruling puts normal life in reach for child of Egyptian rape survivor
Ghislaine Maxwell loses bid to throw out conviction for aiding Jeffrey Epstein
Vatican foreign minister, in Moscow, says Ukraine war must end

Others Also Read