Negri royal row: Undang, disputed ruling chiefs reject exco removal, label move unconstitutional


From left Undang of Johol Datuk Muhammad Abdullah, former Undang of Sungei Ujong Datuk Mubarak Dohak, former Undang of Jelebu Datuk Maarof Mat Rashad and former Undang of Rembau, Abdul Rahim Yassin. However, Mubarak, Maarof and Abdul Rahim are contesting their removal as ruling chiefs.

PETALING JAYA: A Negri Sembilan Undang, three other ruling chiefs whose positions are in dispute and the Tunku Besar Tampin have rejected the removal of the state's 10 executive councillors, calling the move unconstitutional and without effect.

In a joint statement on Friday (Sept 25), the group said decisions concerning the position of state executive councillors must be made on the advice of the Mentri Besar, the state executive council, or both.

“The action by Tunku Muhriz ibni Almarhum Tuanku Munawir in ordering the announcement to remove the Negri Sembilan state executive council was wrong, unconstitutional and without effect.

“Any decision concerning the position of the exco under the Negri Sembilan Constitution 1959 must be referred to and implemented on the advice of the Mentri Besar and/or the state executive council,” they said.

The statement was issued by Undang of Johol Datuk Muhammad Abdullah, alongside Datuk Mubarak Thahak, Datuk Maarof Mat Rashad and Datuk Abdul Rahim Yasin, whose positions as the Undang of Sungei Ujong, Jelebu and Rembau respectively are in dispute.

Tunku Besar Tampin Tunku Syed Razman Syed Idrus Al-Qadri was also a signatory.

The group reiterated its position that Tuanku Muhriz had been removed as Yang di-Pertuan Besar on April 19 under Article 10(1) and (2) of the state Constitution.

They claimed the proclamation was completed with the signature of Mentri Besar Datuk Ismail Lasim on Aug 3 and did not require gazettement.

“We reiterate that Tunku Muhriz ibni Almarhum Tuanku Munawir had already been removed from the throne pursuant to Article 10(1) and (2) of the Negri Sembilan Constitution 1959 on April 19, 2026,” they said.

They maintained that the power to elect and remove the Yang di-Pertuan Besar rested with the Undang Yang Empat, and rejected allegations that the Mentri Besar and exco were responsible for the purported removal.

“The Mentri Besar and exco have absolutely no such power, but were merely carrying out their constitutional duties in complying with our decision as the Undang Yang Empat,” they said.

The statement comes a day after the revocation of the appointments of the 10 exco members was gazetted.

The gazette, dated Sept 24, stated that Tuanku Muhriz had withdrawn his consent and revoked their appointments under Article XXXVIII(5) of the state Constitution after they breached their pledges of allegiance.

The revocation took effect on Sept 20.

 

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Undang , Rejected , Exco , Joint Statement ,

Next In Nation

Prisons Dept: Najib’s nearly eight-hour absence included hospital visit, counselling session
PM to arrive in Manila on Saturday for 49th Asean Summit
Melaka polls: Anwar urges voters to reject those who exploit religion and glorify the corrupt
Hospital in Perlis seeks next of kin of man who died on Oct 24
Missing woman found drowned in Sungai Johor
Langkawi boat capsize: MMEA calls off search for three missing fishermen
Jelebu Undang seeks court declaration to enforce appointment as 17th ruling chief
Man arrested after allegedly strangling mother to death in Banting
Dr Wee: UEC medical entry ruling is not a new policy
Former Padang Besar MP Zahidi passes away

Air Pollutant Index

Note: API is calculated based on 24hr running average of the most dominant parameter.

Highest API Readings

    Select State and Location to view the latest API reading

    Others Also Read