UK law firm fails to halt 1MDB proceedings in Malaysia


PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an application by UK law firm White & Case LLP to stay a High Court ruling allowing a lawsuit filed by 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) to proceed in Malaysia.

The firm had sought to halt the High Court proceedings pending the disposal of two appeals scheduled to be heard by the Court of Appeal on May 20.

However, a three-member bench, comprising Court of Appeal judges Justices Datuk P Ravinthran and  Datuk Faizah Jamaludin, and High Court judge Justice Datuk Ahmad Shahrir Mohd Salleh, rejected the stay application.

ALSO READ: 1MDB sues PSI exec, UK law firm for RM8.61bil

In delivering the court’s unanimous decision on Monday (Feb 23), Justice Ravinthran said the bench was not persuaded that the stay application should be granted.

Addressing the law firm’s argument that it would face significant expense and inconvenience owing to the length of the statement of claim, Justice Ravinthran noted that such burdens are an inherent part of litigation.

Any prejudice arising from the expenditure of time or resources, he said, could be addressed through an award of costs if the firm succeeds on appeal.

Justice Ravinthran noted that the appellate court further observed that the High Court had refused to stay the proceedings and had ordered the law firm to file its statement of defence, with the deadline set to expire on Tuesday (Feb 24).

"A stay of proceedings matter is akin to a case management decision.

"In our view, such a decision should not be lightly interfered with as the High Court should have a free hand in managing the case of the trial unless there is a good reason for further intervention," he said.

He then ordered the law firm to pay RM30,000 in legal costs.

ALSO READ: 1MDB's law firm had no role in US$1bil transfer for PetroSaudi joint venture, court told

The 1MDB suit was filed in the Kuala Lumpur High Court in 2024, seeking US$1.83bil and US$33mil in losses from White & Case and Patrick Mahony, a director of PetroSaudi International Ltd.

The fund alleges that White & Case assisted PetroSaudi in committing fraud and conspired to harm 1MDB while acting as its legal counsel.

The alleged misconduct relates to two corporate transactions: the 2009 joint venture with PetroSaudi International, known as the Good Star phase, and the 2010 restructuring of 1MDB’s stake in the joint venture, which 1MDB claims resulted in significant financial losses.

The writ of summons was served out of jurisdiction on White & Case at its UK offices, and the firm subsequently applied to set aside the service, seeking a declaration that the Malaysian court had no jurisdiction to hear the suit.

Last year, the High Court rejected White & Case’s challenge, ruling that it could hear the lawsuit because the trial witnesses are located in Malaysia. The law firm then appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal.

White & Case is also appealing another High Court decision that ordered this lawsuit to be consolidated with a separate one filed by 1MDB against several other defendants, including Deutsche Bank and PetroSaudi International. – Bernama

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Welfare Dept seeking mother of infant found in Butterworth toilet
Armed conflicts, economic weaponisation among key challenges in Wisma Putra's 2026-2030 plan
Committee endorses structured framework to address unregistered temples issue
Sarawak govt to challenge federal laws on petroleum rights
Sabah quake occurred at great depth, low risk despite high magnitude, say experts
Over 50 schools affected by Sabah floods
Penang cops cripple drug syndicate, seize RM1.2mil in drugs, assets
Dengue cases, deaths more than halved in 2025, says Ahmad Zahid
Sabah floods: Over 70 STPM exam candidates evacuated
Penang MCA sets up panel to help those affected by quit rent hike

Others Also Read