I REFER to your report “A blurring of boundaries” (StarEducation, May 25) which includes a critique of our paper, entitled Students Eye View of A ‘Happening’ ESL Teacher. Your article pointed out that “Many presenters also limited themselves to small-scale studies which lacked depth. Some papers looked like they could have been researched by an undergraduate.”
Yes, ours was no earth-shattering piece of research but it certainly did not deserve such a treatment.
