Clockwise from top left: Tellers announce the results of the vote on Brexit in Parliament in London, Britain, March 13, 2019. Speaker of the House John Bercow speaks ahead of a vote on Brexit. Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May speaks in Parliament ahead of a Brexit vote, in London, Britain, March 13. Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May speaks in Parliament ahead of a Brexit vote. Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond speaks in Parliament . A anti-Brexit protestor Marc 13. - Reuters
LONDON: The British parliament on Wednesday rejected leaving the European Union without a deal, further weakening Prime Minister Theresa May and paving the way for a vote that could delay Brexit until at least the end of June.
After a day of high drama, MPs defied the government by voting 321 to 278 in favour of a motion that ruled out a potentially disorderly "no-deal" Brexit under any circumstances.
It went further than the government's position of keeping the threat of a "no-deal" Brexit on the negotiating table -- a stance many in her party said was essential to push Brussels to make further concessions to the deal they have rejected.
While the approved motion has no legal force and ultimately may not prevent a no-deal exit, it carries considerable political force, especially as it passed thanks to a rebellion by members of May's own Conservative Party and her cabinet.
May, who still insists it is not possible to rule out a no-deal Brexit entirely, said MPs would need to agree a way forward before an extension could be obtained.
The European Commission repeated that a delay would indeed require a justification - but positive comments from Germany and Ireland suggested that EU members at last saw a prospect that a viable deal would be found, and were inclined to help.
The pound
The government said there were now two choices - agree a deal and try to secure a short delay to Brexit, or fail to agree anything and face a much longer delay.
May said her preference was for a short delay, which would mean the government trying to pass the deal she negotiated by the middle of next week.
THIRD ATTEMPT
She hopes to find a way to persuade hardline pro-Brexit MPs to back her deal at the third attempt, on the grounds that the alternatives offer a less clean break with the EU.
But on Wednesday evening, senior eurosceptic MPs were defiant, with one, Steve Baker, declaring they would keep on voting against May's deal if it was put forward again.
Another eurosceptic Conservative lawmaker, Andrew Bridgen, said parliament no longer represented "the people", who had voted for Brexit, by 52 percent to 48, in a referendum in 2016.
"This is very dangerous territory we are going into with regard to our democracy," he told Reuters.
In the text of a motion scheduled for a vote on Thursday, the government said if a deal was reached by March 20, the day before an EU summit, Britain would ask for the Brexit negotiating period to be extended from March 29, the date set in law, until June 30, just before the new European Parliament meets.
If no deal was agreed by March 20, "then it is highly likely the European Council at its meeting the following day would require a clear purpose for any extension, not least to determine its length, and any extension beyond 30 June 2019 would require the United Kingdom to hold European Parliament elections in May 2019", the motion said.
After Wednesday's vote, the European Commission promptly restated its position that it was not enough for parliament to vote against leaving the European Union without a deal -- it also needed to find a deal that MPs could accept.
"SIGN OF REASON"
Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said the EU would want to know the purpose of any British delay, but added: "I think things look a bit brighter today than they did yesterday."
German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas welcomed the British vote as "a sign of reason".
The outcome of the vote angered many pro-Brexit members of the Conservative Party, who had wanted to retain the option of a "no-deal" exit as a bargaining chip, knowing that it would cause disruption in the EU as well as Britain.
After two-and-a-half years of negotiations and two failed attempts to pass the Brexit deal that May agreed with the EU, the vote against a no-deal exit still leaves undecided how, when and on what terms Britain will leave the club it joined in 1973.
After MPs crushed her deal for a second time on Tuesday, May said it was still the best option for leaving in an orderly fashion.
If Britain does seek a delay, it will require the agreement of all the bloc's other 27 members.
The EU would prefer only a short extension, ending before EU-wide parliamentary elections on May 24-26.
May's deal covers such issues as citizens' rights, the status of the Irish border and Britain's divorce bill from the EU. It takes Britain out of the EU single market and customs union, common fisheries and farm policies and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. It also offers a status-quo transition period in which to negotiate trade arrangements.
Under a no-deal exit, there would be no transition period to soften the disruption to trade and regulations. Britain would quit the EU's 500 million-strong single market and customs union and fall back on World Trade Organisation rules, which could mean tariffs on many imports and exports. - Reuters
Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.
