Morgan Stanley, RBC, others settle currency rigging lawsuit in US


Morgan Stanley has invested heavily into growing its residential mortgage and customised lending business in recent years. — Reuters

NEW YORK: Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Canada and three other banks agreed to pay a combined $111.2 million to settle U.S. litigation accusing them of rigging prices in the roughly $5 trillion-a-day foreign exchange market.

The preliminary settlements were detailed in filings late Friday in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, and require a judge's approval.

Fourteen of the 16 banks that were sued have settled, for a total payout of $2.12 billion, court papers show.

Friday's settlements include $50 million for Morgan Stanley, $15.5 million for RBC, $18 million for Societe Generale , $17.2 million for Standard Chartered Plc and $10.5 million for Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ.

The banks denied wrongdoing. Their settlements were reached with help from Kenneth Feinberg, a mediation specialist who previously oversaw funds to compensate victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Investors accused banks of conspiring to manipulate key currency benchmark rates, including the WM/Reuters Closing Spot Rates, or the Fix, through the use of chat rooms with names such as "The Cartel" and "The Mafia," and such tactics as "front running," "banging the close" and "painting the screen."

Lawyers for the investors said Credit Suisse Group AG and Deutsche Bank AG have yet to settle. Deutsche Bank declined to comment. Credit Suisse was not immediately available for comment after market hours.

The litigation followed worldwide probes into currency manipulation that resulted in about $10 billion in fines for several large banks.

U.S. prosecutors have brought related criminal charges against six traders. One has pleaded guilty.

Other banks that have settled the investor litigation are Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, Royal Bank of Scotland and UBS.

The case is In re: Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-07789. - Reuters

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Business News

Grandtech Cloud Services welcomes Justin Tiew Senn as new APAC vice president
UOB posts small drop in quarterly profit, confident of maintaining key margin level
Singapore's MAS asks DBS to identify reasons for disruptions, The Strait Times reports
Ringgit opens lower against US$ amid Middle East tensions
CTOS prospects remain bright despite court ruling
FBM KLCI stays firm, but profit-taking pressures mount
S&P, Dow extend closing streaks despite Disney drag
Trading ideas: Sime Plantation, Sapura Energy, Power Root, OCK, Pekat, Yinson, Mobilia, Siab, Ireka
Loan growth of 7% for CIMB
Semiconductor industry offers chance for growth

Others Also Read