Are unions still relevant in 21st century?


INSTEAD of claiming that union busting has become a very serious problem in Malaysia and that some employers have regarded unions as their sworn enemy, “Union busting a very serious problem now, says MTUC” (The Star, April 30), the Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC) should try to understand why employers are not welcoming unions with open arms.

In dealing with the typical situation of supply and demand, employers know that to attract and retain workers, the salaries and conditions of service, like benefits, must be competitive.

This would depend on the ability and capability of employers and taking into consideration whether the company can sustain its business and also give its owners a fair return on the investment.

Still, by virtue of the Industrial Relations Act, unions can claim for recognition from employers to represent the workers. So, having done its best to give competitive salaries and conditions of service to its workers, it would be natural for most employers to resist any claim of recognition by unions, especially when the employer is confident that the majority of its workers are not union members.

However, the Industrial Relations Act also allows the union to report to the director-general of Industrial Relations in the event that recognition is not accorded. The law gives the director-general power to ascertain by way of a secret ballot the percentage of workers who are members of the union and then for the Human Resources Minister to decide whether recognition is to be accorded or not.

A few years ago, a recognition claim was made by the national union on a large private hospital with more than 1,000 workers. As the hospital is a known leader in providing competitive salaries and conditions of service, the recognition was not accorded to the union.

As provided by the Industrial Relations Act, a secret ballot was conducted with the end result that less than 10% of the workers were union members. Has the said union taken advantage of the Industrial Relations Act by simply claiming for recognition?

I’ve had my share of experience on the issue of recognition claim by unions. While I stand corrected, it seems to me that large companies tend to be the target of unionisation, even though these companies usually tend to be more competitive in salaries and conditions of service.

Can it be assumed that larger companies with more workers translate to the potential of more subscriptions to be collected?

With the various laws relating to employment that stipulate the minimum conditions of service and workers protection, are unions still relevant in the 21st century ?

LCP

Penang

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Letters

Anthony Loke must explain alleged RM178mil VEP contract award to Nasir Baki's company
Three warnings in 30 days: The balance-sheet risk stewardship keeps missing
Five-year sentence reflects failure of healthcare, protection, and compassion
When trees turn deadly: Rethinking urban tree management
Lonely journey of raising a neurodivergent child
Strengthening the Road Transport Act the right way
Growing resilience through science
KWAP's eFishery losses: The buck stops at the Finance Ministry
The magic number could well be 65, not 36, in Negri Sembilan
Judge us by financial health, not age

Others Also Read