Balancing geopolitical interests


ON March 27, 2014, after the Russian annexation of Crimea, Malaysia voted in favour of UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 supporting the territorial integrity of Ukraine. It was surreal: a year before, I was in Yalta visiting the site of the conference which shaped the peace after World War II. On March 2, 2022, Malaysia voted for UN General Assembly Resolution ES-11/1 which “deplores in the strongest terms the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine; and demands it immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces”.

This was the view of most of the world, including around half of our fellow members of the OIC, and our Asean neighbours except Laos and Vietnam (although Myanmar’s UN Ambassador doesn’t speak for its rulers). The rest abstained; only Belarus, Syria, North Korea and Eritrea joined Russia in voting against the resolution. Despite its strong wording, in reality many countries are still balancing competing geopolitical interests by issuing softer bilateral statements.

The Star Christmas Special Promo: Save 35% OFF Yearly. T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Tunku Zain Al-‘Abidin ,

Next In Columnists

The tallest trees, the deepest roots
Contenders do whatever it takes to win as EPL title race heats up
Bridging the digital divide through Malaysia-China collaboration
Precious pearls of wisdom on bead insertion
What a foot-stomping year
In 2026, stability must become delivery
Tech war endgame
All the world’s a stage
Our 2026 resolution: Spend wisely
Betrayal and power struggle in Perlis

Others Also Read