Balancing geopolitical interests


ON March 27, 2014, after the Russian annexation of Crimea, Malaysia voted in favour of UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 supporting the territorial integrity of Ukraine. It was surreal: a year before, I was in Yalta visiting the site of the conference which shaped the peace after World War II. On March 2, 2022, Malaysia voted for UN General Assembly Resolution ES-11/1 which “deplores in the strongest terms the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine; and demands it immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces”.

This was the view of most of the world, including around half of our fellow members of the OIC, and our Asean neighbours except Laos and Vietnam (although Myanmar’s UN Ambassador doesn’t speak for its rulers). The rest abstained; only Belarus, Syria, North Korea and Eritrea joined Russia in voting against the resolution. Despite its strong wording, in reality many countries are still balancing competing geopolitical interests by issuing softer bilateral statements.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Tunku Zain Al-‘Abidin ,

Next In Columnists

Seeking truth in the fog of war
Stuck in those ivory towers
Why buying local players still wins in the Premier League
Digital China: A new era of China-Malaysia technological partnership
The inexorable distance between PAS and the Malaysian Chinese community
The impact of HPV on male and female cancers
A party in free fall?
Did the US win anything in Iran?
When it comes to texts, if you can’t verify, bury it
Pakatan mulling test election in Perak

Others Also Read