Balancing geopolitical interests


ON March 27, 2014, after the Russian annexation of Crimea, Malaysia voted in favour of UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 supporting the territorial integrity of Ukraine. It was surreal: a year before, I was in Yalta visiting the site of the conference which shaped the peace after World War II. On March 2, 2022, Malaysia voted for UN General Assembly Resolution ES-11/1 which “deplores in the strongest terms the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine; and demands it immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces”.

This was the view of most of the world, including around half of our fellow members of the OIC, and our Asean neighbours except Laos and Vietnam (although Myanmar’s UN Ambassador doesn’t speak for its rulers). The rest abstained; only Belarus, Syria, North Korea and Eritrea joined Russia in voting against the resolution. Despite its strong wording, in reality many countries are still balancing competing geopolitical interests by issuing softer bilateral statements.

The Star Festive Promo: Get 35% OFF Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Tunku Zain Al-‘Abidin ,

Next In Columnists

Geopolitics across time and space
Shared festivities bind communities
Breaking down Premier League title race and top five battle in final stretch
Tunku’s legacy must not fade away
RCEP Green Digital Corridor: Malaysia and China’s next growth engine
Financial sovereignty: Who designs the platforms rules the future
Turning Valentine pills into everyday thrills
A surgical strike too far?
Faith and the law
Let’s keep our hearts and our doors open

Others Also Read