BNP Paribas to face revived lawsuit over Sudanese genocide- U.S. appeals court

  • World
  • Wednesday, 22 May 2019

FILE PHOTO: A BNP Paribas logo is seen outside a bank office in Nantes, France, February 5, 2019. REUTERS/Stephane Mahe/File Photo

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday revived a lawsuit against BNP Paribas SA by alleged victims of a genocidal regime in Sudan, who sought to hold the French bank liable for aiding in the government's atrocities.

The 3-0 decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan came nearly five years after BNP Paribas agreed to plead guilty and pay an $8.97 billion penalty to settle U.S. charges it transferred billions of dollars for Sudanese, Iranian and Cuban entities subject to economic sanctions.

Circuit Judge Barrington Parker said claims against BNP Paribas based on genocide in Sudan were subject to U.S. judicial review, and a lower court judge erred in concluding otherwise.

Twenty-one refugees now living in the United States filed the proposed class action against BNP Paribas in 2016, over its role as the Sudan regime's main bank from 1997 to 2007.

They said BNP Paribas' processing of thousands of illegal transactions through its New York offices furthered the regime's campaign of murder, mass rape, torture and deliberate HIV infection against its own people.

A bank spokeswoman declined to comment. Lawyers for the plaintiffs had no immediate comment.

In dismissing the lawsuit in March 2018, U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan in Manhattan said the act of state doctrine barred her from examining the validity of Sudan's official actions, and therefore whether BNP Paribas should be liable for aiding them.

Parker, however, said Sudan's own laws and the "universal international consensus" against genocide prevented U.S. courts from declaring genocide an "official act" of Sudan.

"Considering the lack of evidence introduced by BNPP that genocide is the official policy of Sudan, and the countervailing evidence that genocide blatantly violates Sudan's own laws, we conclude that there is simply no 'official act' that a court would be required to 'declare invalid' in order to adjudicate plaintiffs' claims," he wrote.

The appeals court also said Nathan erred in dismissing some claims as untimely. It returned the case to her for further proceedings.

BNP Paribas' June 2014 guilty plea was the first by a global bank to large-scale, systematic violations of U.S. economic sanctions, the Department of Justice said at the time.

The case is Kashef et al v BNP Paribas et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 18-1304.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Susan Thomas)

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights

Next In World

Algerian crisis interim president Bensalah dies aged 80
Turkey's top Islamic cleric moves centre stage, irking secularists
Colombia dismisses Nicaragua's World Court claims over maritime boundaries
Monitors to audit Moscow online vote after outcry - Inferfax
Russian and U.S. military chiefs meet to discuss risk mitigation - report
Nigerians offer artworks to British Museum in new take on looted bronzes
Czech president Zeman to be released from hospital on Wednesday
Aide to Ukraine's president survives assassination attempt
Canaries volcano lava gushes towards sea, eruption goes on
Divided Swiss to vote on same-sex marriage after fraught campaign

Stories You'll Enjoy